Drug Transport, Inc. and New Hampshire Insurance Company v. McCarter Williams ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                              COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Alston, Decker and Senior Judge Coleman*
    UNPUBLISHED
    DRUG TRANSPORT, INC. AND NEW
    HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
    MEMORANDUM OPINION**
    v.     Record No. 1790-14-2                                         PER CURIAM
    FEBRUARY 18, 2015
    McCARTER WILLIAMS
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (S. Vernon Priddy III; Andrew H.D. Wilson; Two Rivers Law
    Group, P.C., on briefs), for appellants.
    (Jamie L. Karek; Commonwealth Law Group, on brief), for
    appellee.
    Drug Transport, Inc. and New Hampshire Insurance Company (collectively employer)
    appeal the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (commission) awarding
    McCarter Williams (claimant) medical benefits for a neck injury. On appeal, employer argues
    that the commission erred when it (1) reversed a deputy commissioner’s holding that claimant’s
    claim for treatment of his neck injury was barred by res judicata and in remanding the matter to
    the deputy commissioner for further consideration; and (2) declined to reconsider its earlier
    ruling that the doctrine of res judicata did not bar recovery for claimant’s neck injury. We have
    reviewed the record and the commission’s opinions and find that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its opinions. See Williams v.
    Drug Transp. Inc., JCN VA00000553371 (Jan. 16, 2014 and Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with
    *
    Judge Coleman took part in the consideration of this case prior to the effective date of
    his retirement as senior judge on January 31, 2015.
    **
    Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
    oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
    Affirmed.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1790142

Filed Date: 2/18/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021