Roscoe Chitwood v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours , 29 Va. App. 611 ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                      COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Benton, Coleman and Elder
    Argued at Richmond, Virginia
    ROSCOE CHITWOOD
    OPINION BY
    v.   Record No. 1566-98-2               JUDGE SAM W. COLEMAN III
    APRIL 27, 1999
    E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC.
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    Peter McIntosh (Gary Kendall; Michie,
    Hamlett, Lowry, Rasmussen & Tweel, on brief),
    for appellant.
    Stephen D. Busch (Samuel L. Tarry, Jr.;
    McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, on brief),
    for appellee.
    In this workers’ compensation appeal, we determine whether
    the commission correctly allowed an employer credit for payments
    made for stage one asbestosis against an award for stage two
    asbestosis under Code § 65.2-503(B)(17)(b).     For the following
    reasons, we find that the commission did not err; accordingly,
    we affirm.
    BACKGROUND
    In 1996, the Workers’ Compensation Commission found that
    Roscoe Chitwood suffered from second-stage asbestosis, a type of
    pneumoconiosis, and awarded him one hundred weeks of permanent,
    partial compensation benefits.     After paying fifty weeks of
    benefits, the employer ceased payments because it had previously
    paid Chitwood fifty weeks of benefits for stage one asbestosis,
    pursuant to an award entered in 1986.    Chitwood filed for
    additional benefits, claiming that benefits under Code
    § 65.2-503(B)(17) are not progressive and that a stage two
    rating entitles a claimant to an additional one hundred weeks of
    benefits after having received fifty weeks of benefits for stage
    one.   The commission ruled that employer was entitled to credit
    the previously paid fifty weeks of compensation benefits for
    stage one asbestosis against the one hundred weeks awarded for
    stage two.   Chitwood appeals the commission’s decision.
    ANALYSIS
    “This Court is not bound by the legal determinations made
    by the commission.   ‘[W]e must inquire to determine if the
    correct legal conclusion has been reached.’”    Cibula v. Allied
    Fibers & Plastics, 
    14 Va. App. 319
    , 324, 
    416 S.E.2d 708
    , 711
    (1992) (quoting City of Norfolk v. Bennett, 
    205 Va. 877
    , 880,
    
    140 S.E.2d 655
    , 657 (1965)), aff’d, 
    245 Va. 337
    , 
    428 S.E.2d 905
    (1993).   However, the commission’s construction of the Workers’
    Compensation Act is “entitled to great weight on appeal.”
    Wiggins v. Fairfax Park, Ltd., 
    22 Va. App. 432
    , 441, 
    470 S.E.2d 591
    , 596 (1996).
    Code § 65.2-503 addresses, among other matters, permanent
    partial and permanent total loss arising from pneumoconiosis,
    “including but not limited to silicosis and asbestosis.”      Code
    § 65.2-503 contains no language specifically allowing employers
    - 2 -
    to credit awards for first- or second-stage pneumoconiosis
    against subsequent awards for second- or third-stage
    pneumoconiosis.
    The claimant asserts that because Code § 65.2-504(B),
    dealing with “black lung” benefits for coal miners’
    pneumoconiosis, specifically authorizes credits for benefits an
    employer has paid for partial disability against later permanent
    disability lifetime benefits, the absence of a similar provision
    in Code § 65.2-503, dealing with asbestosis, demonstrates a
    legislative intent to not provide for credits under Code
    § 65.2-503.    We agree with the commission’s conclusion that Code
    § 65.2-504, the Coal Miner’s Pneumoconiosis Act, has no
    applicability here and provides no basis for comparison.       Code
    § 65.2-504(B) was enacted pursuant to a federal mandate under 30
    U.S.C. 801 et seq., the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act
    of 1969, to enact a uniform federal program for coal miners
    afflicted with “black lung.”    This statute must be construed
    according to its own language and is independent of Code
    § 65.2-503.
    Code § 65.2-503 is known as the “scheduled benefits”
    statute.    It allows for benefits to be paid an injured employee
    according to a percentage of the average weekly wage for a
    specific “scheduled” number of weeks for the loss or loss of use
    of a body member regardless of the employee’s disability from
    work.    Code § 65.2-503 further provides that for partial,
    - 3 -
    permanent loss of a member, or partial, permanent loss of use of
    a member, or partial loss of vision, the commission may issue a
    correspondingly proportionate award.   See Code § 65.2-503(D).
    Code § 65.2-503(B)(17) provides scheduled benefits for the
    various stages of pneumoconiosis, including silicosis and
    asbestosis.   The three stages of pneumoconiosis listed in Code
    § 65.2-503, and further defined in Rule 11 of the Rules of the
    Workers’ Compensation Commission, represent progressively more
    advanced stages of the disease.   These defined levels permit
    partial and proportional compensation for varying degrees of
    disease in the same manner that Code § 65.2-503(D) permits
    proportional compensation for partial loss of use of a member or
    of vision.
    In Owen v. The Chesapeake Corp., 
    198 Va. 440
    , 442, 
    94 S.E.2d 462
    , 463 (1956), the Supreme Court interpreted Code
    § 65.2-503 to provide that a claimant who sustained a
    progressive increase in his permanent loss of vision received
    additional benefits for only the increased loss.   Additionally,
    the commission has interpreted Code § 65.2-503 to provide that
    an increased loss of use of a member results in benefits
    proportional only to the increased loss.   See Mabe v. Lightning
    Transportation, Inc., VWC File No. 155-89-02 (July 3, 1996);
    Shank v. Rockingham Poultry Marketing Cooperative, Inc., VWC
    File No. 132-36-51 (Sept. 6, 1994); Rife v. Garden Creek
    Pocahontas Company, VWC File No. 140-11-39 (Aug. 11, 1992).
    - 4 -
    Although not bound by the commission’s decisions, we give great
    weight to its interpretation of the Act.   See Wiggins, 22 Va.
    App. at 
    441, 470 S.E.2d at 596
    .
    We find no reason to decline to apply the proportional
    award provision in subsection (D) to scheduled benefits for the
    various progressive stages of pneumoconiosis.   Therefore, we
    hold that Code § 65.2-503(B) contemplates that a claimant with
    pneumoconiosis be awarded compensation only in proportion to any
    increase in the severity of his or her disease.   A claimant with
    first-stage pneumoconiosis receives an award of fifty weeks, and
    a claimant with second-stage pneumoconiosis receives one hundred
    weeks.   The claimant already in receipt of a fifty-week award
    for pneumoconiosis who thereafter progresses to second-stage is
    entitled to an award only proportional to the degree in which
    the disease has advanced -- in other words, fifty weeks.    Thus,
    an employer may credit awards for first- and second-stage
    pneumoconiosis against awards for second- and third-stage
    pneumoconiosis, respectively.   To hold otherwise would create an
    irrational windfall for claimants whose diseases advance from an
    early finding of first-stage pneumoconiosis as opposed to
    claimants who are initially determined to suffer from second- or
    third-stage pneumoconiosis.
    Accordingly, we affirm the commission’s decision.
    Affirmed.
    - 5 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1566982

Citation Numbers: 29 Va. App. 611, 513 S.E.2d 890, 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 235

Judges: Benton, Coleman, Elder

Filed Date: 4/27/1999

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/15/2024