Eunice Pauline Todd v. James Edward Todd ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                      COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:    Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton
    EUNICE PAULINE TODD
    MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    v.   Record No. 2115-95-2                          PER CURIAM
    JULY 30, 1996
    JAMES EDWARD TODD
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF PETERSBURG
    James F. D'Alton, Jr., Judge
    (Beverly D. Crawford; El-Amin & Crawford, on
    brief), for appellant.
    (James Edward Sheffield, on brief), for
    appellee.
    Eunice P. Todd (wife) appeals from the circuit court's
    qualified domestic relations order and final decree awarding a
    divorce to James E. Todd (husband).    Upon reviewing the record
    and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is
    without merit.    Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of
    the trial court.    Rule 5A:27.
    Wife contends that the commissioner abused his discretion by
    refusing to allow her to submit additional evidence following a
    hearing of which she had notice but did not appear.    Wife's
    counsel stated that wife told him why she was not going to
    appear, "but that is a matter of privileged information unless
    she authorizes me to release it, and in my opinion it is relevant
    and important."    Wife's counsel stated at the conclusion of the
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    hearing that he expected to contact wife "and then make a motion
    to the Court over your ruling if she desires to."   Wife filed no
    objections to the commissioner's report.   Counsel for wife signed
    the final decree without exception.
    "The established rule in Virginia is that parts of a
    commissioner's report not excepted to are 'considered as admitted
    to be correct,' as the party excepting '"must put his finger on
    the error" so that the court may see what it has to decide.'"
    McLaughlin v. McLaughlin, 
    2 Va. App. 463
    , 470, 
    346 S.E.2d 535
    ,
    539 (1986) (citation omitted).   We will not consider on appeal
    rulings that were not excepted to in the trial court.   Wife filed
    no exceptions to the commissioner's report or relevant motion
    with the trial court.   Therefore, wife has failed to preserve any
    objections to the actions of the commissioner.
    Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily
    affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2115952

Filed Date: 7/30/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014