Michael Ray Short v. Commonwealth of Virginia ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Benton, Bray and Bumgardner
    Argued at Salem, Virginia
    MICHAEL RAY SHORT
    MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY
    v.      Record No. 2274-98-3            JUDGE RUDOLPH BUMGARDNER, III
    OCTOBER 26, 1999
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PITTSYLVANIA COUNTY
    William N. Alexander, II, Judge
    Jesse W. Meadows, III, for appellant.
    Donald E. Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney
    General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on
    brief), for appellee.
    Michael Ray Short was indicted for statutory burglary and
    three charges of grand larceny.     Pursuant to a plea agreement,
    he pled guilty to one charge of grand larceny of a truck, and
    the trial court nolle prossed the remaining charges.        On appeal,
    the defendant argues that the trial court improperly ordered him
    to pay restitution for crimes for which he was not tried or
    convicted.     Because the sentencing order did not order
    restitution to anyone other than the owner of the stolen truck,
    we dismiss this appeal.
    The defendant and a codefendant broke into an auto repair
    shop.     They took a truck belonging to Brian Crews and two
    * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code
    § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.
    toolboxes full of tools belonging to the shop owner, William
    Andrews, and an employee, James Hubbard.
    The defendant argues the trial court erred in ordering him
    to pay restitution to Andrews and Hubbard for the stolen tools.
    However, the order from which the defendant appeals does not
    support his contention.   The order only provides restitution to
    Brian Crews, the owner of the truck stolen by the defendant.    It
    contains no direction to pay restitution to either Andrews or
    Hubbard.   A court speaks only through its orders, see Jones v.
    Commonwealth, 
    24 Va. App. 636
    , 649, 
    484 S.E.2d 618
    , 620 (1997),
    and the issues raised on this appeal are not reflected in the
    order.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
    Dismissed.
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2274983

Filed Date: 10/26/1999

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/31/2014