Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Craig Theimer ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                              COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Alston, Chafin and Senior Judge Haley
    UNPUBLISHED
    COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
    AND INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
    OF NORTH AMERICA
    MEMORANDUM OPINION*
    v.     Record No. 1471-15-4                                          PER CURIAM
    JANUARY 26, 2016
    CRAIG THEIMER
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (David A. Obuchowicz; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for
    appellants.
    (Robert A. Mordhorst; Locklin & Mordhorst, on brief), for appellee.
    Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Indemnity Insurance Company of North America
    (collectively employer) appeal the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission
    (Commission) awarding Craig Theimer (claimant) medical and temporary total disability
    benefits for a lower back injury. On appeal, employer argues that the Commission erred when it
    (1) attributed claimant’s back injury to a “twinge” claimant felt when claimant’s testimony and
    the medical evidence related the injury to a “pop” felt by claimant when he twisted while
    stepping off a ladder; and (2) found that claimant described a compensable accident when
    claimant testified the injury occurred when he felt a “pop” in his lower back when he twisted
    while stepping off a ladder and failed to identify any increased risk of his employment caused by
    the ladder. We have reviewed the record and the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal
    is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
    opinion. See Theimer v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., JCN VA00001007729 (Aug. 18,
    2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
    Affirmed.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1471154

Filed Date: 1/26/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/26/2016