Edward Alexander Beckford, Jr. v. Commonwealth ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                   COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Bray and Annunziata
    Argued at Alexandria, Virginia
    EDWARD ALEXANDER BECKFORD, JR.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY
    v.   Record No. 1976-99-2          JUDGE ROSEMARIE ANNUNZIATA
    MAY 30, 2000
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LANCASTER COUNTY
    Joseph E. Spruill, Jr., Judge
    (Robert L. Cunningham, on brief), for appellant.
    Appellant submitting on brief.
    Robert H. Anderson, III, Assistant Attorney
    General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General,
    on brief), for appellee.
    On April 29, 1999, Edward Beckford and Andre Noel were
    tried jointly on various charges stemming from a drug
    distribution conspiracy in Lancaster County.   Beckford was
    convicted in the bench trial of conspiracy to distribute
    cocaine, distribution of cocaine, possession of cocaine with
    intent to distribute, and transportation of cocaine.    Beckford
    contends that the trial court erred 1) in admitting a written
    out-of-court statement of Faith Parker, a co-conspirator; 2) in
    admitting oral out-of-court statements made by Parker; and 3) in
    admitting the weight of imitation replicas of cocaine "cookies"
    * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code
    § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.
    as demonstrative evidence.   We find that Beckford has failed to
    preserve his claims for appeal, and affirm the convictions.
    FACTS
    In the summer of 1998, the Lancaster County Sheriff's
    Department began an investigation of a drug trafficking
    conspiracy involving a group of individuals calling themselves
    the "Jersey Boys."   These individuals were suspected of
    trafficking in "crack" cocaine and distributing it in Lancaster
    County.    Ashby Allen, Jr., Chief Investigator for the Sheriff's
    Department, and Investigator Joan Webb headed the investigation.
    Webb hired a paid informant, Mary Beale, to conduct controlled
    purchases of cocaine from the Jersey Boys.    On September 9,
    1998, Allen and Webb went to Beale's apartment in Kilmarnock,
    where Beale placed a telephone call to Arthur Fisher, one of the
    Jersey Boys.   Allen and Webb hid in Beale's bedroom when Fisher
    arrived.   Beale and Fisher discussed a purchase of drugs, and
    Fisher made several telephone calls.    On the telephone Fisher
    spoke to "Marquis" and "Dre"; one of Beckford's aliases was
    Marquis Givins.   After making the telephone calls, Fisher left
    the apartment, but soon returned, accompanied by Beckford's
    codefendant, Noel, nicknamed "Dre."     Allen and Webb overheard
    Beale, Fisher, and Noel negotiating the drug sale.    After Fisher
    and Noel left the apartment, the officers recovered a substance
    from Beale later determined to be cocaine.
    - 2 -
    Fisher testified for the Commonwealth.    He admitted that he
    sold cocaine to Beale on the evening of the controlled purchase
    and that he had purchased the cocaine in question from Noel.
    Fisher further testified that he had first encountered the
    Jersey Boys in the summer of 1998 and that members of the group
    included Noel, Beckford, Keith Mayweather, and Daniel Ford.
    Fisher stated that all of the Jersey Boys lived together in a
    house on Kilmarnock Road.
    Francis Norris also testified.    Norris owns a house in
    Merry Point, located in Lancaster County, which he rented to
    Faith Parker in the summer of 1998.    While cutting the grass at
    the house, Norris discovered a large rock of cocaine hidden
    beneath a board near the house.   Disturbed by the discovery,
    Norris destroyed the rock of cocaine and evicted Parker.   Parker
    told Norris that the cocaine did not belong to her, but belonged
    to Daniel Ford.   Parker told Norris that she was afraid of Ford
    and his associates, and she gave Norris a telephone number where
    he could contact them.   Norris phoned Ford, and asked whether
    the cocaine was his.   Ford initially denied the cocaine belonged
    to him, but when Norris told him he had destroyed it, Ford said
    the drugs were "part of his job" and demanded payment for its
    value.
    Investigator Allen testified that on October 14, 1998,
    Parker offered a written statement at the Lancaster County
    - 3 -
    Sheriff's office.   Parker was not under arrest at that time.
    She stated that she had known the Jersey Boys, whom she
    identified as Noel, Ford, Beckford (whom she identified by his
    alias "Marquis Givins"), and Mayweather (whom she identified as
    "Keith Grant") since February, 1998.     She knew they sold drugs.
    She stated that she accompanied them on an unspecified date to
    Ford's home in Newark, New Jersey, to pick up cocaine.    The four
    men dropped her off in Newark and proceeded to New York.    When
    they returned to Newark, Parker saw them package the cocaine,
    storing it in the gear shift mechanism of the car for the return
    trip to Virginia.   Parker further stated that she accompanied
    Ford and an individual named George on a second trip to New
    Jersey in August, 1998 and that they obtained cocaine there.
    She stated that in September, 1998, members of the ring stored
    cocaine at her house, which Norris subsequently found and
    destroyed.    She stated that Ford called her and demanded the
    monetary value of the destroyed cocaine and that Beckford and
    Mayweather "wanted to hurt me or Mr. Norris."    The statement was
    admitted into evidence over the objection of counsel for both
    defendants.
    Allen further testified, over objection by Noel's counsel,
    that in addition to her written statement, Parker described the
    cocaine purchased by the Jersey Boys for distribution in
    Lancaster County as "cookies."    By this term, Parker meant
    - 4 -
    "large pieces of crack cocaine."    Because Allen was previously
    unfamiliar with this term for rock cocaine, he questioned Parker
    in detail about the "cookies."    She described them as "about the
    size of a personal pan pizza," and said that in one trip, the
    ring brought back "four or five" such "cookies," which were
    approximately four and one-half inches in diameter and
    one-fourth of an inch in thickness.      Parker stated that the ring
    members paid approximately $8,000 for the "cookies" in question.
    Parker admitted that once the cocaine was packaged, she boarded
    a bus with it and brought it to Virginia. 1
    Allen testified additionally that, based upon Parker's
    description of the "cookies," he created a model of a "cookie"
    from dental stone, a substance used by the police to make
    castings of footprints and tool marks.     He presented the model
    to Parker, and she told him it was "the exact size and weight"
    of the "cookies" she transported from New Jersey to Virginia.
    Allen then weighed the model, and determined its weight to be
    148.5 grams.   The Commonwealth offered the model into evidence.
    The model was admitted over objection by Noel, who based his
    objection on the ground that the model was "a result of
    1
    Investigator Webb's testimony substantially matched that
    of Investigator Allen concerning the statements made by Parker.
    Counsel for Noel objected to Webb's recital of Parker's
    statements, stating he "would have the same objection as
    before." Counsel for Beckford raised no objection, however, and
    did not join in Noel's objection.
    - 5 -
    hearsay."   Beckford "join[ed] in the objection."   The court
    admitted the model.
    ANALYSIS
    Beckford has failed to preserve his claims for appeal.
    While Noel objected to Investigator Allen's recounting of the
    oral statements made by Parker, Beckford did not.   Although
    Beckford objected to the admission of Parker's written statement
    during the direct examination of Investigator Allen, when
    Investigator Webb later testified and recounted the content of
    Parker's statement, Noel renewed his earlier objection, but
    Beckford failed to do so.   Also, when Beckford joined in Noel's
    objection to the admissibility of the model "cookie," he did so
    on the ground that it was the result of hearsay; his claim on
    appeal concerns whether a sufficient foundation was laid.
    Because Rule 5A:18 provides that "[n]o ruling of the trial court
    . . . will be considered as a basis for reversal unless the
    objection was stated together with the grounds therefor at the
    time of the ruling, except for good cause shown or . . . to
    attain the ends of justice," Beckford's failure to object to
    Parker's oral out-of-court statements bars his claim on this
    issue.   See People v. Foster, 
    473 N.Y.S.2d 978
    , 984 (N.Y. 1984)
    (in a joint trial, codefendants "cannot avail themselves of
    their [codefendant's] objection"); Wolfe v. East Texas Seed Co.,
    
    583 S.W.2d 481
    , 482 (Tx. App. 1979) (appellant who failed to
    - 6 -
    make objection at trial cannot avail himself of codefendant's
    objection to preserve issue for appeal); Poston v. Ragan, 
    187 S.E.2d 503
    , 505 (N.C. App. 1972) (a party is not entitled to the
    benefit of an exception not taken by himself, and therefore
    exception taken by one party is not available to a co-party).
    Moreover, when a party objects to the admissibility of
    material offered as evidence, and the same material is
    subsequently offered as evidence, failure to restate the
    objection constitutes a waiver of the previous objection.     See
    Phillip Greenberg, Inc. v. Dunville, 
    166 Va. 398
    , 404, 
    185 S.E. 892
    , 894 (1936); Portner v. Portner's Ex'rs, 
    133 Va. 251
    , 263,
    
    112 S.E. 762
    , 766 (1922); C & O Ry. Co. v. Greaver, 
    110 Va. 350
    ,
    354, 
    66 S.E. 59
    , 60 (1909).   Thus, Beckford's failure during the
    testimony of Investigator Webb to renew his earlier objection to
    the admission of Parker's written statement effected a waiver of
    the prior objection.
    Finally, although Beckford properly joined in Noel's
    objection to the model "cookie" on the ground that its admission
    was the result of improperly admitted hearsay evidence, Beckford
    bases his argument on appeal on the Commonwealth's failure to
    properly establish that the model constituted "illustrative
    evidence" of the nature of the cocaine "cookies" transported by
    Parker.   Because Beckford did not object to the evidence on this
    ground, and we find no basis to apply either the good cause or
    - 7 -
    ends of justice exceptions to the Rule, we will not consider the
    argument on appeal.   See Singleton v. Commonwealth, 
    19 Va. App. 728
    , 735, 
    453 S.E.2d 921
    , 926 (1995) (en banc); Reed v.
    Commonwealth, 
    6 Va. App. 65
    , 70, 
    366 S.E.2d 274
    , 277 (1988).
    Beckford has thus failed to preserve his claims for appeal, and
    we consider them no further.
    Affirmed.
    - 8 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1976992

Filed Date: 5/30/2000

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014