Fairfax County School Board v. Michael S. Hall ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                              COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Petty, AtLee and Senior Judge Clements
    UNPUBLISHED
    FAIRFAX COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
    MEMORANDUM OPINION*
    v.     Record No. 0001-16-4                                           PER CURIAM
    JUNE 7, 2016
    MICHAEL S. HALL
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (Michael N. Salveson; G. Bethany Ingle; Littler Mendelson, P.C., on
    briefs), for appellant.
    (Andrew S. Kasmer, on brief), for appellee.
    Fairfax County School Board (employer) appeals a decision of the Workers’
    Compensation Commission finding that Michael Hall proved a compensable injury by accident
    and that there was a causal connection between the disability and injury.
    On appeal, employer presents four assignments of error:
    1. The [Commission] erred in finding that Michael Hall . . .
    proved a compensable injury by accident.
    2. The Commission erred by failing to make findings of fact with
    respect to the location of the claimant’s alleged accident.
    3. The Commission erred by failing to make findings of fact with
    respect to the credibility of the testifying witnesses – the claimant
    and John Swain.
    4. The Commission erred by finding no error in the Deputy
    Commissioner’s determinations that the claimant suffered a new
    left wrist injury and was totally disabled as a result of that alleged
    injury.
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
    We have reviewed the record and the Commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is
    without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the Commission in its final
    opinion. See Hall v. Fairfax Cty. Pub. Schs., VWC File No. VA00000992089 (Dec. 3, 2015).
    We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
    Affirmed.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 0001164

Filed Date: 6/7/2016

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021