Jase Marcellus Mondy, etc v. Commonwealth ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                     COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Willis, Bray and Retired Judge Whitehurst *
    Argued at Norfolk, Virginia
    JASE MARCELLUS MONDY, S/K/A
    JACE M. MONDY
    v.         Record No. 1642-93-1          MEMORANDUM OPINION** BY
    JUDGE JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR.
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA                     JUNE 20, 1995
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF CHESAPEAKE
    E. Preston Grissom, Judge
    David W. Bouchard (Bouchard & Smith, on
    brief), for appellant.
    Donald R. Curry, Senior Assistant Attorney
    General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney
    General, on brief), for appellee.
    On appeal from his convictions of first degree murder and
    use of a firearm in the commission of a murder, Jase Marcellus
    Mondy contends that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of
    law to support his convictions.
    "When considering the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal
    of a criminal conviction, we must view all the evidence in the
    light most favorable to the Commonwealth and accord to the
    evidence all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom."
    Traverso v. Commonwealth, 
    6 Va. App. 172
    , 176, 
    366 S.E.2d 719
    ,
    721 (1988) (citations omitted).   "The jury's verdict will not be
    *
    Retired Judge Alfred W. Whitehurst took part in the
    consideration of this case by designation pursuant to Code
    § 17-116.01.
    **
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    disturbed on appeal unless it is plainly wrong or without
    evidence to support it."    Id.
    Steven Love, the victim, was a known drug dealer and Mondy
    was his bodyguard.    On September 9, 1991, Love's body was found
    in an empty house located at 2212 Berkeley Avenue in Chesapeake.
    Mondy had spent several nights at that house between July and
    August of 1991.   Mondy's clothes were found strewn on the floor
    around Love's body.
    Love's death occurred sometime between 8:00 p.m. on
    September 8th and 11:30 a.m. on September 9th.    He was last seen
    alive on September 8 at about 7:30 p.m. by Kenneth Brown, his
    roommate.   He was then going out with Mondy to do a "gun
    transaction."   He was carrying between $4,000 and $5,000 in cash
    and one-half ounce of cocaine.     Neither the money nor the cocaine
    was on Love's body when he was found.
    Brown testified that he saw Mondy an hour later, but Love
    was not with him.    Mondy told Brown that Love was with his
    girlfriend, Sherrie Cook.   Ms. Cook testified that she last saw
    Love on September 7.
    On September 8, Latyna Williams and Sean Sweat were to drive
    to North Carolina with Mondy.     They were unable to contact him on
    his beeper from 8:30 p.m. until midnight.    Ms. Williams testified
    that when they finally met him, he was carrying the brown leather
    book bag in which she knew he carried his .380 caliber handgun.
    Before leaving Chesapeake, the three of them drove to the
    - 2 -
    neighborhood where Love's body was found the next day.      Mondy and
    Sweat got out of the car and were gone twenty minutes.
    The cause of Love's death was a "gunshot wound to the back
    of the head."   The bullet was fired from a .380 caliber handgun.
    Several witnesses testified that Mondy owned a .380.       When Mondy
    was arrested a month later in North Carolina, he was in
    possession of the murder weapon.
    Mondy contends that the evidence is insufficient to support
    his convictions.   He argues that because the evidence is entirely
    circumstantial, "to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt all
    the necessary circumstances proved must be consistent with guilt
    and inconsistent with innocence."       Harrell v. Commonwealth, 
    11 Va. App. 1
    , 9, 
    396 S.E.2d 680
    , 684 (1990).      He argues that the
    evidence does not exclude the possibility that a third party
    killed Love.    However, no evidence supports this hypothesis.
    "The Commonwealth need only exclude reasonable hypotheses of
    innocence that flow from the evidence, not those that spring from
    the imagination of the defendant."       Hollins v. Commonwealth, 
    19 Va. App. 223
    , 229, 
    450 S.E.2d 397
    , 400 (1994) (quoting Hamilton
    v. Commonwealth, 
    16 Va. App. 751
    , 755, 
    433 S.E.2d 27
    , 29 (1993)
    (citations omitted)).
    Mondy was with Love on the night of the murder.      Mondy knew
    that Love was a drug dealer and that he carried large sums of
    money and drugs.   Mondy had stayed previously at the house where
    Love's body was found.   Love was killed with a .380 caliber
    - 3 -
    handgun, a type owned by Mondy and in his possession on the night
    of the murder.    Mondy was in possession of the murder weapon when
    he was arrested.    See Schlimme v. Commonwealth, 
    16 Va. App. 15
    ,
    21, 
    427 S.E.2d 431
    , 435 (1993) (sufficient evidence of criminal
    agency where defendant found in possession of gun five months
    after offense).
    No evidence suggests that another person killed Love.     "It
    has been stated that in cases involving circumstantial evidence
    . . . '[w]here all the circumstances of time, place, motive,
    means, opportunity, and conduct concur in pointing out the
    accused as the perpetrator of the crime . . . the evidence is
    powerfully strengthened by the total absence of any trace or
    vestige of any other agent.'"    Hall v. Commonwealth, 
    2 Va. App. 671
    , 674, 
    347 S.E.2d 193
    , 194 (1986) (quoting Lyons v. City of
    Petersburg, 
    221 Va. 10
    , 13, 
    266 S.E.2d 880
    , 881 (1980)).
    We find the evidence sufficient to support Mondy's
    convictions and affirm the judgments of the trial court.
    Affirmed.
    - 4 -