Portsmouth General Hospital v. Tammy Dobbs ( 1999 )


Menu:
  •                      COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:    Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis
    PORTSMOUTH GENERAL HOSPITAL AND
    BON SECOURS HEALTH SYSTEM, INC./
    PMA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
    MEMORANDUM OPINION*
    v.   Record No. 0682-99-1                         PER CURIAM
    SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
    TAMMY JO DOBBS
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (Richard E. Garriott, Jr.; Clarke, Dolph,
    Rapaport, Hardy & Hull, P.L.C., on brief),
    for appellants.
    (Jeffrey F. Brooke; M. Todd Gerber; Huff,
    Poole & Mahoney, P.C., on brief), for
    appellee.
    Portsmouth General Hospital and its insurer (hereinafter
    referred to as "employer") contend that the Workers’
    Compensation Commission erred in finding that Tammy Jo Dobbs'
    injuries were causally related to her March 29, 1997 injury by
    accident.     Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the
    parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission’s decision.        See
    Rule 5A:27.
    On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable
    to the prevailing party below.     See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.
    * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code
    § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication.
    Mullins, 
    10 Va. App. 211
    , 212, 
    390 S.E.2d 788
    , 788 (1990).    "The
    actual determination of causation is a factual finding that will
    not be disturbed on appeal if there is credible evidence to
    support the finding."   Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick, 
    7 Va. App. 684
    , 688, 
    376 S.E.2d 814
    , 817 (1989).
    In ruling that Dobbs met her burden of proof, the
    commission found as follows:
    Dr. [Frederick] Jordan found [Dobbs']
    problem consistent with the March 1997,
    accident. He immediately referred [her] to
    Dr. [J.C.P.] Collier. The report of Harry
    Poland, physician assistant, refers to
    [Dobbs'] original injury and a continuation
    of slight ongoing problems. This report and
    that of Dr. Jordan, contradict the September
    16, 1997, report of Dr. [Glenn J.] Jakobsen
    indicating that [Dobbs'] pain had resolved
    on its own, and that she only began having
    pain again approximately three weeks
    earlier. [Dr. Jakobsen's] report notes
    [Dobbs] recalled a slip and fall at that
    time, but she was uncertain whether this was
    a precipitating event. We note that Dr.
    Jakobsen diagnosed myofascial pain syndrome,
    and not the ultimate problem of a herniated
    disc. Dr. [Anthony] Cetrone's February 17,
    1998, letter indicates that it was unclear
    that [Dobbs'] symptoms resulted from the
    fall and that it was probably represented
    probably more of a myofascititis. However,
    ultimately Dr. Collier and Dr. [Mark B.]
    Kerner diagnosed a herniated disc. Dr.
    Kerner has indicated both in November [1997]
    letter and in his deposition that based on
    his history and evaluation [Dobbs']
    condition was a result of the March
    accident. While [Dr. Kerner] acknowledged
    that if [Dobbs] suffered a fall in August
    that could be the cause of her condition, we
    find that the record does not support an
    August fall. We note that the deputy
    commissioner had an opportunity to observe
    - 2 -
    the witness and found [Dobbs] to be
    credible, as did Dr. Kerner. We therefore
    find the opinion of Dr. Kerner, the treating
    physician, outweighs that of Dr. Jakobsen
    and Dr. Cetrone who examined [Dobbs] on a
    limited basis and failed to diagnose a
    herniated disc.
    "Medical evidence is not necessarily conclusive, but is
    subject to the commission's consideration and weighing."
    Hungerford Mechanical Corp. v. Hobson, 
    11 Va. App. 675
    , 677, 
    401 S.E.2d 213
    , 214 (1991).   In its role as fact finder, the
    commission was entitled to weigh the medical evidence.    The
    commission did so and accepted the opinion of the treating
    physician, Dr. Kerner, while rejecting the contrary opinions of
    Drs. Jakobsen and Cetrone.   "Questions raised by conflicting
    medical opinions must be decided by the commission."     Penley v.
    Island Creek Coal Co., 
    8 Va. App. 310
    , 318, 
    381 S.E.2d 231
    , 236
    (1989).
    Dr. Kerner's opinion and Dobbs' testimony constitute
    credible evidence supporting the commission's decision.     "The
    fact that there is contrary evidence in the record is of no
    consequence if there is credible evidence to support the
    commission's finding."    Wagner Enters., Inc. v. Brooks, 
    12 Va. App. 890
    , 894, 
    407 S.E.2d 32
    , 35 (1991).
    For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.
    Affirmed.
    - 3 -