Truland Sys. Corp v. Richard L. Portorsnok ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                     COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:   Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick
    TRULAND SYSTEMS CORPORATION
    AND
    TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
    MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    v.         Record No. 0762-97-4                PER CURIAM
    JULY 29, 1997
    RICHARD L. PORTORSNOK
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (William R. Korth; Law Offices of Francis H.
    Foley, on brief), for appellants.
    No brief for appellee.
    Truland Systems Corporation and its insurer (hereinafter
    jointly referred to as employer) contend that the Workers'
    Compensation Commission (commission) erred in dismissing
    employer's request for review on the ground that it was not
    timely filed.   Upon reviewing the record, employer's brief, and
    Richard L. Portorsnok's (claimant) motion to dismiss, we conclude
    that this appeal is without merit.   Accordingly, we summarily
    affirm the commission's decision.    Rule 5A:27.
    On January 31, 1997, the deputy commissioner rendered an
    opinion awarding various benefits to claimant.     By letter dated
    February 17, 1997 and sent via first-class mail, employer
    requested a review by the full commission of the deputy
    commissioner's decision.   The commission received employer's
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    request for review on February 21, 1997, twenty-one days after
    the date of the deputy commissioner's award.   The commission
    dismissed employer's request for review as untimely filed.
    Code § 65.2-705(A) requires that an application for review
    to the full commission must be made within twenty days from the
    date of the award.    In addition, Rule 3.1 of the Rules of the
    Virginia Workers' Compensation Commission requires that "[a]
    request for review of a decision or award of the Commission shall
    be filed by a party in writing with the Clerk of the Commission
    within 20 days of the date of such decision or award."    Code
    § 65.2-101 specifies that filing by first-class mail "shall be
    deemed completed only when the application actually reaches a
    Commission office."   Absent fraud or mistake, the decisions of
    the commission or its deputy commissioners from which no party
    seeks timely review are binding upon the commission.     See K & L
    Trucking Co. v. Thurber, 
    1 Va. App. 213
    , 219, 
    337 S.E.2d 299
    , 302
    (1985).
    It was undisputed that the commission did not receive
    employer's request for review until February 21, 1997, more than
    twenty days after the deputy commissioner's January 31, 1997
    decision.   Therefore, the commission did not err in holding that
    it lacked jurisdiction to consider employer's request for review.
    Employer's reliance on Rule 1:7 of the Rules of the Supreme
    Court of Virginia is misplaced.   The three-day grace period
    provided by Rule 1:7 applies only in a situation where a party is
    2
    required to act under those rules "after service of a paper upon
    him."    Code § 65.2-705(A) makes clear that the twenty-day period
    runs from the date of the award.
    For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.
    Affirmed.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 0762974

Filed Date: 7/29/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014