Taylor Walkingshield v. Culpepper Co. DSS ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                    COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:   Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton
    TAYLOR WALKINGSHIELD
    AND
    RICHARD MARLOWE
    v.   Record No. 1048-95-4                        MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    PER CURIAM
    CULPEPER COUNTY DEPARTMENT                        FEBRUARY 20, 1996
    OF SOCIAL SERVICES
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CULPEPER COUNTY
    John R. Cullen, Judge
    (Monica J. Chernin, on brief), for appellants.
    No brief for appellee.
    Taylor Walkingshield and Richard Marlowe appeal the decision
    of the circuit court denying their petition to vacate and hold
    void the October 19, 1994 consent order of the juvenile and
    domestic relations district court.   The appellants challenged the
    district court order because no guardian ad litem had been
    appointed for their minor child at the time of the order.       Upon
    reviewing the record and opening brief, we conclude that this
    appeal is without merit.    Accordingly, we summarily affirm the
    decision of the trial court.   Rule 5A:27.
    "On appeal, the judgment of the trial court is presumed to
    be correct; its findings will not be overturned by this Court
    except in cases of manifest error.   The burden is upon the party
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    alleging trial court error to show by the record that the
    judgment was erroneous."   Steinberg v. Steinberg, 
    11 Va. App. 323
    , 326, 
    398 S.E.2d 507
    , 508 (1990).   The circuit court found
    that the district court order from which the appeal was taken was
    "an interlocutory order which made no findings and was not
    dispositive," and was "a temporary order, did not adjudicate the
    issues or render a final disposition, and is not void for failure
    of the court to appoint a Guardian ad litem" prior to the entry
    of the order.
    Under Code § 16.1-296, an appeal to the appropriate circuit
    court may be taken from "any final order or judgment of the
    juvenile court."   The record supports the circuit court's
    findings, and demonstrates that the district court order was not
    a final order.   Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is
    summarily affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 1048954

Filed Date: 2/20/1996

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021