Courtaluds, etc. v. Joseph D. Ricchetti ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                     COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Willis, Fitzpatrick and Overton
    Argued at Salem, Virginia
    COURTAULDS PERFORMANCE FILMS, ET AL.
    v.         Record No. 1961-95-3         MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY
    JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON
    JOSEPH D. RICCHETTI                        APRIL 30, 1996
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    Joseph C. Veith, III (Montedonico, Hamilton &
    Altman, on brief), for appellants.
    Stephen G. Bass (Carter, Craig, Bass, Blair &
    Kushner, P.C., on brief), for appellee.
    Joseph Ricchetti suffered an injury by accident in April
    1994 while employed with Courtaulds Performance Films (employer).
    The Workers' Compensation Commission awarded him benefits based
    on this injury.   Employer challenges the decision of the
    commission as to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the
    award and the admission of the Employer's First Report of
    Accident before the commission.   We find that credible evidence
    supports the findings of the commission and affirm the
    commission.
    The parties are fully conversant with the record to this
    case, and a recitation of the facts is unnecessary to this
    memorandum opinion.
    Guided by well established principles, we construe the
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    evidence in the light most favorable to the party prevailing
    below.   Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge, Inc., 
    1 Va. App. 503
    , 504, 
    339 S.E.2d 916
    , 916 (1986).    "If there is evidence, or
    reasonable inferences can be drawn from the evidence, to support
    the Commission's findings, they will not be disturbed on review,
    even though there is evidence in the record to support a contrary
    finding."     Morris v. Badger Powhatan/Figgie Int'l, Inc., 3 Va.
    App. 276, 279, 
    348 S.E.2d 876
    , 877 (1986); see Code § 65.2-706.
    "In determining whether credible evidence exists," this Court
    will not "retry the facts, reweigh the preponderance of the
    evidence, or make its own determination of the credibility of the
    witnesses."     Wagner Enters., Inc. v. Brooks, 
    12 Va. App. 890
    ,
    894, 
    407 S.E.2d 32
    , 35 (1991) (citation omitted).    "[A]
    determination of causation is a factual finding."     Ingersoll-Rand
    Co. v. Musick, 
    7 Va. App. 684
    , 688, 
    376 S.E.2d 814
    , 817 (1989).
    In this case, the testimony and medical records provided
    credible evidence to support the commission's finding that
    Ricchetti had sustained a compensable injury by accident on April
    23, 1994.   Ricchetti's own testimony as to the events of that day
    was uncontradicted.    The medical reports of two doctors link his
    disability to the accident occurring that day.
    Employer assigns error to the consideration by the full
    commission of the Employer's First Report of Accident, a
    mandatory preliminary accident report.    Because we find that the
    evidence without this report is sufficient to support the
    - 2 -
    commission's award of benefits, we need not decide whether the
    consideration of this document constitutes error.
    The award of the commission is affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    - 3 -