Grace E. Falls v. VA Mennonite Retirement ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                     COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:   Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton
    GRACE E. FALLS
    v.   Record No. 1040-96-3                        MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    PER CURIAM
    VIRGINIA MENNONITE RETIREMENT                      OCTOBER 1, 1996
    AND
    CENTURY INDEMNITY COMPANY
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (A. Thomas Lane, Jr., on brief), for
    appellant.
    (Douglas A. Seymour, on brief), for
    appellees.
    Grace E. Falls ("claimant") contends that the Workers'
    Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding that her
    current symptomatology concerning her upper back, neck, shoulder
    and cervical condition was not causally related to her
    compensable October 3, 1990 injury by accident.      Upon reviewing
    the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this
    appeal is without merit.    Accordingly, we summarily affirm the
    commission's decision.   Rule 5A:27.
    On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable
    to the prevailing party below.    R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.
    Mullins, 
    10 Va. App. 211
    , 212, 
    390 S.E.2d 788
    , 788 (1990).       "The
    actual determination of causation is a factual finding that will
    not be disturbed on appeal if there is credible evidence to
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    support the finding."   Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Musick, 
    7 Va. App. 684
    , 688, 
    376 S.E.2d 814
    , 817 (1989).   "Questions raised by
    conflicting medical opinions must be decided by the commission."
    Penley v. Island Creek Coal Co., 
    8 Va. App. 310
    , 318, 
    381 S.E.2d 231
    , 236 (1989).
    In ruling that Virginia Mennonite Retirement ("employer")
    sustained its burden of proof, the commission found as follows:
    The Deputy Commissioner relied heavily on the
    medical records of the claimant's treating
    physician, Dr. [Galen] Craun. In addition to
    relying on Dr. Craun, we also rely on the
    employer medical evaluator, Dr. [George A.]
    Godette, and the medical records reviewer,
    Dr. [James N.] Nutt. We find Dr. Craun's
    deposition testimony credible in that when
    [claimant] first presented to him in October,
    1990, five days after the accident, she
    complained only of low back pain. [Claimant]
    continued treating with Dr. Craun until May
    22, 1991. During this period, Dr. Craun
    testified that [claimant] made no complaints
    for any physical ailment other than her low
    back. Thus, Dr. Craun treated [claimant]
    only for her low back. Dr. Craun's medical
    records corroborate his testimony. We place
    more weight on the treating physician's (Dr.
    Craun's) testimony and contemporaneous
    medical records than the opinions of Dr.
    Riggleman and Dr. Andrea Trescot expressed
    five years after the injury.
    In its role as fact finder, the commission was entitled to
    weigh the medical evidence and to accept the opinions of Drs.
    Craun, Godette, and Nutt.   The commission was also entitled to
    reject the opinions of Drs. Riggleman and Trescot.   The opinions
    of Drs. Craun, Godette, and Nutt, as well as Dr. Craun's
    contemporaneous medical records, constitute credible evidence to
    2
    support the commission's decision.   "The existence of contrary
    evidence in the record is of no consequence if there is credible
    evidence to support the commission's finding."   Wagner Enters.,
    Inc. v. Brooks, 
    12 Va. App. 890
    , 894, 
    407 S.E.2d 32
    , 35 (1991).
    For the reasons stated, we affirm the commission's decision.
    Affirmed.
    3