Advanced Lock & Safe Inc. etal v. Robert S. Heidorn ( 1996 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Baker, Annunziata, and Overton
    Argued at Alexandria, Virginia
    ADVANCED LOCK AND SAFE, INC. and
    NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
    v.              Record No. 2467-94-4         MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY
    JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON
    ROBERT S. HEIDORN                                JANUARY 11, 1996
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    Edward H. Grove, III (Brault, Palmer, Grove,
    Zimmerman, White & Mims, on brief), for
    appellants.
    Peter M. Sweeny (Peter M. Sweeny & Associates, on
    brief), for appellee.
    Advanced Lock and Safe, employer, and Nationwide Mutual
    Insurance Company, insurer, appeal the decision of the commission
    to award Robert Heidorn benefits for a work-related injury by
    accident.       Employer contends that the injury did not arise out of
    Heidorn's employment.       We affirm the commission's award.
    Robert Heidorn was employed as a locksmith, replacing the
    locks on interior office doors.         Because of his height, he "got
    down on his knees" on the floor beside each door instead of
    bending over to work on it.       On the sixth or seventh door,
    Heidorn "bent down [and] had a pressure on my right knee and
    turned just a little bit."       He felt a pain shoot through it just
    before his knees touched the ground.         His treating physician
    *
    Pursuant to Code        §    17-116.010   this   opinion   is   not
    designated for publication.
    later opined that the cartilage in his knee had been torn.
    An accident arises out of the employment when a causal
    connection exists between the injury and the conditions under
    which the employer requires the work to be performed.    County of
    Chesterfield v. Johnson, 
    237 Va. 180
    , 183, 
    376 S.E.2d 73
    , 75
    (1989).   An employee's need to work in a bent over position and
    to extract himself from that position presents a hazard to which
    the employee would not otherwise be exposed.   Richard E. Brown,
    Inc. v. Caporaletti, 
    12 Va. App. 242
    , 245, 
    402 S.E.2d 709
    , 711
    (1991).   A contortion of the body necessitated by the employee's
    work is risk created by the workplace.   First Fed. Sav. & Loan v.
    Gryder, 
    9 Va. App. 60
    , 65, 
    383 S.E.2d 755
    , 759 (1989).   The
    injury need not be caused by an extraordinary occurrence in or
    about the work performed, nor must the precipitating movement be
    unusual or require exertion.   Grove v. Allied Signal, Inc., 
    15 Va. App. 17
    , 22, 
    421 S.E.2d 32
    , 35 (1992).
    The commission found that Heidorn's injury was caused by
    kneeling down.   It further found that his job required him to
    make that specific movement.   We find credible evidence in the
    record to support this finding, and affirm the award of the
    commission.
    Affirmed.
    - 2 -