John Henry Thornburg, Jr. v. Cheryl A. B. Thornburg ( 1997 )


Menu:
  •                     COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:   Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis
    JOHN HENRY THORNBURG, JR.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    v.   Record No. 2056-96-3                           PER CURIAM
    FEBRUARY 18, 1997
    CHERYL ANN BUCKLES THORNBURG
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF BRISTOL
    Charles B. Flannagan, II, Judge
    (Ralph M. Dillow, Jr.; Dillow and Esposito,
    on brief), for appellant.
    (Nancyjean Bradford; Bradford & Poe, on
    brief), for appellee.
    John Henry Thornburg, Jr. appeals the decision of the
    circuit court granting a divorce on the ground of a one-year
    separation.    Husband contends the court erred in not granting the
    divorce on the ground of desertion and in awarding permanent
    spousal support to wife.    Upon reviewing the record and briefs of
    the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court.
    Rule 5A:27.
    I.
    The trial court did not err in granting a divorce on the
    ground of a one-year separation.      The evidence proved facts
    sufficient to grant a divorce on that ground.      Furthermore, the
    trial court did not find that wife deserted the marriage.      Even
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    assuming that the evidence was sufficient to prove desertion by
    wife, a trial court is "not compelled 'to give precedence to one
    proven ground of divorce over another.'"    Williams v. Williams,
    
    14 Va. App. 217
    , 220, 
    415 S.E.2d 252
    , 253 (1992) (citation
    omitted).    "It is well established that 'where dual or multiple
    grounds for divorce exist, the trial judge can use his sound
    discretion to select the grounds upon which he will grant the
    divorce.'"    Id. (citation omitted).
    II.
    The only ground that statutorily bars a spouse's right to
    support is adultery.   Code § 20-107.1.   Therefore, husband's
    contention that wife's alleged desertion bars an award of spousal
    support is without merit.
    Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily
    affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2056963

Filed Date: 2/18/1997

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014