Richard Dwight Hite, Jr. v. Commonwealth ( 1996 )

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Willis, Bray and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia RICHARD DWIGHT HITE, JR. MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 2268-95-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON OCTOBER 15, 1996 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG AND COUNTY OF JAMES CITY Russell M. Carneal, Judge Designate Jon M. Babineau for appellant. John K. Byrum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee. Richard Dwight Hite, a juvenile, appeals his convictions of robbery and use of a firearm in the commission of a robbery. Hite takes issue primarily with the transfer procedure from the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court to the Circuit Court. Hite argues that the circuit court judge did not review the documents sent up from the lower court to ensure that they were properly completed. As support for his argument, he offers a typographical error on one transfer order. This contention has no merit. The record contains no evidence that the judge did not review the documents. We cannot reach that conclusion upon the bare assertion by the defendant. Furthermore, Code § 16.1-269.6(B)(i) only requires the judge to examine the * Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication. transfer documents if either the juvenile or the Commonwealth appeals the transfer. Neither occurred in this case. Hite next argues that the typographical error itself and the failure of the circuit court to advise the Commonwealth to seek indictments prohibited the circuit court from assuming jurisdiction. These objections were not raised before the arraignment, however, and are waived. Code § 16.1-169.6(E). We find no reversible error present in the trial at the circuit court, and we therefore affirm the convictions. Affirmed. - 2 -