Debra (Walker) Scott v. Tony Scott ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:   Judges Elder, Felton and Senior Judge Willis
    DEBRA (WALKER) SCOTT
    MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    v.   Record No. 2830-02-2                        PER CURIAM
    FEBRUARY 11, 2003
    TONY SCOTT
    FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF POWHATAN COUNTY
    Thomas V. Warren, Judge
    (William Mills Krieger, on brief), for
    appellant. Appellant submitting on brief.
    No brief for appellee.
    Debra (Walker) Scott (wife) appeals the decision of the
    circuit court dismissing her bill of complaint seeking a divorce
    from Tony Scott (husband).    On appeal, wife contends the trial
    court erred by finding husband, a prisoner, could not waive the
    appointment of a guardian ad litem.    Wife asks that we reverse the
    trial court's order dismissing the case and remand for
    consideration upon the merits.    Upon reviewing the record and
    opening brief, we agree with wife and reverse.
    Background
    Wife filed a bill of complaint seeking a divorce from husband
    on January 20, 2002.    She asserted they had been separated for
    over one year.    Husband was incarcerated at the time and submitted
    * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    to the court a waiver of right to guardian ad litem on February 4,
    2002, waiving his rights to be represented in the divorce and
    requesting the court not appoint a guardian ad litem.   The trial
    court dismissed the action, holding that the appointment of a
    guardian ad litem cannot be waived.
    Analysis
    "Convicts are not civilly dead in Virginia, and . . . [are]
    not legally incompetent to transact business either before or
    after [a] conviction in the criminal case."     Dunn v. Terry, 
    216 Va. 234
    , 239, 
    217 S.E.2d 849
    , 854 (1975).   "[T]he appointment of
    a [guardian ad litem is] a procedural provision which [can] be
    waived by a prisoner."   Cross v. Sundin, 
    222 Va. 37
    , 38, 
    278 S.E.2d 805
    , 806 (1981); see also Pigg v. Commonwealth, 
    17 Va. App. 756
    , 760, 
    441 S.E.2d 216
    , 219 (1994) (en banc).
    Husband permissibly waived his right to the appointment of
    a guardian ad litem, and the trial court erred by dismissing the
    action.   Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
    Reversed and remanded.
    - 2 -
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2830022

Filed Date: 2/11/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021