Wood v. Davis ( 1792 )

By the Court.

It is not necessary that the time appointed for the delivery of the property should be stated to be that at which the sale is to take place. The law does not require it, nor can it produce any benefit whatever to the obligors, that it should be so stated.

Judgment affirmed.⁽¹⁾

(1) Irvin v. Eldridge, Burnside v. Court, post.