Walthol v. Johnson , 6 Va. 232 ( 1800 )

PER CUR.

There was nothing improper in submiting the evidence to the jury: But it might have been otherwise, if it had been gaming, usury or any other thing of that nature, which was to have been proved.

Judgment affirmed.^*

* [* See Vaughn's adm'r. v. Winckler's ex'r. 4 Munf. 136; Lewis v. Long, 3 Munf. 136; Canty v. Sumter, 2 Bay, 93; Frear v. Evertson, 20 Johns. R. 142; and Carr, J. in Ben et al. v. Peete, 2 Rand./ 547-549.]