C.W. Wright etc v. William E. McAlister ( 1995 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Fitzpatrick
    Argued at Alexandria, Virginia
    C. W. WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and
    PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY
    v.             Record No. 2134-94-4        MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY
    JUDGE RICHARD S. BRAY
    WILLIAM E. McALISTER                            MAY 2, 1995
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    A. James Kauffman (G. Wythe Michael, Jr.; Taylor, Hazen &
    Kauffman, on brief), for appellants.
    John J. McGrath, Jr. (Janney, Janney & McGrath, on brief),
    for appellee.
    C. W. Wright Construction Company, Inc. and Pacific Employers
    Insurance Company (together "employer") appeal the commission's
    finding that William E. McAlister (claimant) suffered from an
    occupational disease, carpal tunnel syndrome, and an award of
    attendant benefits.      Employer contends that the evidence was
    insufficient to support the claim. 1    We affirm the decision of the
    commission.
    The parties are fully conversant with the record in this case,
    and we recite only those facts necessary to explain our holding.
    Under familiar principles, this Court will construe the
    evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below,
    claimant in this instance.      Crisp v. Brown's Tysons Corner Dodge,
    Inc., 
    1 Va. App. 503
    , 504, 
    339 S.E.2d 916
    , 916 (1986).       "'Whether a
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated
    for publication.
    1
    Although employer identifies several issues on appeal, we have
    considered them collectively in a sufficiency analysis.
    disease is causally related to the employment and not causally
    related to other factors is . . . a finding of fact.'   When there
    is credible evidence to support it, such a finding of fact [by the
    commission] is 'conclusive and binding' on this Court."     Ross
    Laboratories v. Barbour, 
    13 Va. App. 373
    , 377-78, 
    412 S.E.2d 205
    ,
    208 (1991) (quoting Island Creek Coal Co. v. Breeding, 
    6 Va. App. 1
    , 12, 
    365 S.E.2d 782
    , 788 (1988)); Code § 65.2-706(A).
    On September 11, 1992, claimant first visited Dr. Jonathan K.
    Malone, the treating physician, complaining of "numbness and
    swelling" in his right hand.   Dr. Malone noted in his records that
    claimant's symptoms were indicative of carpal tunnel syndrome and
    successfully performed "carpal tunnel release" surgery on November
    13, 1993.    In correspondence dated June 18, 1993, Dr. Malone
    associated carpal tunnel syndrome with "repetitive use of the hands
    and wrists," and, noting that claimant's work "required this type
    of repetitive use," concluded that he developed the condition "due
    to the nature of his job."   In a later report, Dr. Malone described
    this pathology as "an occupational disease" caused by the
    "repetitive nature in which [claimant] used his hands."
    This evidence, considered with the entire record, provided
    sufficient support to the commission's finding that claimant
    suffered a compensable, occupational disease.    See Code
    § 65.2-400(B); Piedmont Mfg. Co. v. East, 
    17 Va. App. 499
    , 503, 
    438 S.E.2d 769
    , 772 (1993); Dep't of State Police v. Haga, 
    18 Va. App. 162
    , 165-66, 
    442 S.E.2d 765
    , 425-26 (1994).   Accordingly, we affirm
    the award.
    - 2 -
    Affirmed.
    - 3 -