Scott v. Trent ( 1792 )

The PRESIDENT

delivered the opinion of the court.

*It is undoubtedly true, that a debt due from an individual partner cannot be set off against a partnership demand. A payment indeed, to one partner, will be a payment to the company, and his receipt (unless perhaps, where such payment is forbidden by the company) will bind the whole. But in this case, the receipts do not specify, that the payments were made for the use of the company. The list does; but in that, the balance is not stated, and therefore being entirely’ unsettled, the court did right, in refusing to let it go in evidence to the jury.

If indeed, P. Trent has received the balance, and should be unable to pay it, Scott may obtain relief against the company by getting an injunction for so such.

Judgment affirmed.