City of Richmond School Bd. v. Joan Jones ( 1998 )


Menu:
  •                     COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
    Present:    Judges Benton, Coleman and Willis
    CITY OF RICHMOND SCHOOL BOARD
    AND TRIGON ADMINISTRATORS
    MEMORANDUM OPINION *
    v.   Record No. 0649-98-2                            PER CURIAM
    AUGUST 25, 1998
    JOAN E. JONES
    FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION
    (M. Janet Palmer; Wilder & Gregory, on
    brief), for appellants.
    (Ruth E. Nathanson; Marks & Harrison, on
    brief), for appellee.
    City of Richmond School Board ("employer") contends that the
    Workers' Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding
    that Joan E. Jones ("claimant") proved that her post-February 7,
    1997 disability was causally related to her compensable November
    13, 1995 injury by accident.    Upon reviewing the record and the
    briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without
    merit.   Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's
    decision.    See Rule 5A:27.
    On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable
    to the prevailing party below.    See R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v.
    Mullins, 
    10 Va. App. 211
    , 212, 
    390 S.E.2d 788
    , 788 (1990).      In
    granting claimant's change-in-condition application, the
    commission found as follows:
    The Deputy Commissioner weighed the
    *
    Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
    designated for publication.
    inconsistencies in the medical evidence and
    the testimony and found the claimant was not
    a credible witness. Upon Review, we do not
    find the inconsistencies significant with
    regard to the determination of causation.
    The claimant testified, and the medical
    records confirm, that she suffered ongoing
    back pain following her return to work after
    the industrial accident. She denied injury
    resulting from a second motor vehicle
    accident which occurred in March, 1997.
    Although we discount Dr. [Walton M.] Belle's
    opinion regarding causation because he did
    not know about the second accident, we find
    Dr. [Ralph E.] Hagan's reports support a
    finding that the claimant's disability
    beginning February 7, 1997 resulted from the
    industrial accident.
    *      *      *      *      *      *       *
    [W]e find the second accident did not
    materially change the claimant's symptoms
    from the previous industrial accident. The
    facts indicate that if the funeral accident
    exacerbated the claimant's back condition,
    the aggravation was mild and insufficient to
    justify a finding that the claimant's back
    problems are not related to [sic] industrial
    accident.
    (Citations omitted.).
    Employer contends that the commission erred in reversing the
    deputy commissioner's credibility determination.    However,
    "[w]hen the deputy commissioner makes an explicit finding of
    credibility based upon a witness' demeanor or appearance at the
    hearing, the commission may reverse that factual finding when it
    articulates a basis for its different conclusion that is
    supported by credible evidence."     Bullion Hollow Enters., Inc. v.
    Lane, 
    14 Va. App. 725
    , 728, 
    418 S.E.2d 904
    , 907 (1992).
    Here, the commission clearly articulated its reasons for
    -2-
    reversing the deputy commissioner's credibility determination.
    Moreover, the commission's findings are supported by credible
    evidence, and are therefore, conclusive and binding on appeal.
    See Ross Laboratories v. Barbour, 
    13 Va. App. 373
    , 377-78, 
    412 S.E.2d 205
    , 208 (1991).
    Claimant's testimony, along with the medical records and
    opinions of Dr. Hagan, constitutes credible evidence to support
    the commission's finding that claimant proved that her
    post-February 7, 1997 disability was causally related to her
    compensable industrial accident.    Based upon claimant's
    testimony, the commission could reasonably infer that although
    Dr. Hagan mistakenly recorded an incorrect date for the second
    accident, he was fully aware of it and, yet, did not relate
    claimant's post-February 7, 1997 disability to that second
    accident.   "Where reasonable inferences may be drawn from the
    evidence in support of the commission's factual findings, they
    will not be disturbed on appeal."     Hawks v. Henrico County Sch.
    Bd., 
    7 Va. App. 398
    , 404, 
    374 S.E.2d 695
    , 698 (1988).
    For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.
    Affirmed.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 0649982

Filed Date: 8/25/1998

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021