Weed v. Butterfield ( 1813 )


Menu:
  • By the Court.

    It is clear that the evidence does not support either count in the declaration. There ought to have been another count for work and labour,' or a count for money had and received, as the defendant had received money for the cutting of the spars? which belonged to the plaintiff.

    The plaintiff suffered a nonsuit.

Document Info

Filed Date: 12/15/1813

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/3/2024