Nichols v. Nichols , 133 Vt. 370 ( 1975 )


Menu:
  • Keyser, J.

    This is an appeal from the judgment of divorce granted the plaintiff. The proceeding was uncontested below except on the issue of child support. The order contained the following provision: “Defendant ordered to (a) pay to plaintiff, toward support of minor child, $30.00 per week to child’s emancipation or age 18; (b) pay to plaintiff as alimony $35.00 per week, to her death or remarriage, to reduce to $15.00 per week when she resumes employment;----”

    *371By his appeal the defendant contends the trial court erred in making a provision in the final order for alimony without first giving notice to the parties that it was an issue and giving them an opportunity to present evidence thereon.

    The plaintiff used a printed form in drawing her petition for divorce. As required it was executed under oath. The petition shows that alimony as an issue for the court to consider was struck from the form. Plaintiff did not at that time or at any subsequent time pray that she be granted alimony.

    A review of the petition, temporary order and transcript fails to indicate that alimony was raised as an issue. Nor does it disclose that the trial court was considering it as such and that it would make provision for alimony in its order. We find nothing in plaintiff’s testimony to intimate that she was asking for alimony or that she had altered the position she had taken in her petition respecting it.

    We are not unmindful that the court has the power to award alimony under 15 V.S.A. § 754, but that is not the question here. Neither is V.R.C.P. 15(b) applicable since the record is barren of any express or implied consent that alimony was at issue although not raised by the pleadings.

    It is apparent the defendant was given no notice or an opportunity to be heard on the issue of alimony. See V.R.C.P. 80(d); cf. Emrick v. Connarn, 128 Vt. 202, 206, 260 A.2d 380 (1969). For this reason and in order to remove all doubt in the procedure adopted, the case is appropriate for remand on this single issue.

    Affirmed excepting that the part of the judgment order providing for the payment of alimony is reversed and remanded for a hearing on the issue of alimony.

Document Info

Docket Number: 216-73

Citation Numbers: 340 A.2d 73, 133 Vt. 370, 1975 Vt. LEXIS 406

Judges: Keyser, Barney, Smith, Eyser, Daley, Shangraw

Filed Date: 6/3/1975

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/16/2024