Smith Building Permit ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                             State of Vermont
    Superior Court—Environmental Division
    ======================================================================
    ENTRY REGARDING MOTION
    ======================================================================
    In re Smith Building Permit                                        Docket No. 208-12-10 Vtec
    (Zoning Board of Adjustment Decision)
    Title: Motion for Subpoena Duces Tecum (Filing No. 13)
    Filed: September 12, 2012
    Filed By: Applicant/Appellants William and Rosemary Smith
    No Response filed
    X Granted                         ___ Denied                ___ Other
    William and Rosemary Smith (“Applicants”) have appealed the Town of Concord
    Zoning Board of Adjustment’s (“the ZBA”) decision denying them a second permit to complete
    their building of a 30-foot by 50-foot garage on property they own in the Town of Concord,
    Vermont. Their original building permit expired. In preparation for the merits hearing,
    Applicants filed a request that the Court issue a subpoena duces tecum that Appellants will
    thereafter need to make the necessary arrangements to have served on the FEMA Map
    Assistance Management Agency in Elkridge, MD.
    Rule 26(b)(1) of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure dictates that parties may obtain all
    evidence that is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The
    documents Applicants request are admissible under Rules 803(8) and 1005 of the Vermont Rules
    of Evidence, which, taken together, deem copies of records and reports kept by a public agency
    in its ordinary course of business admissible at trial. Accordingly, we GRANT Applicants’
    request for a subpoena duces tecum.
    Although we have granted Applicants’ request, because the FEMA office from which
    Applicants request documents is in Maryland, there are procedural hurdles that they must
    overcome in order to serve their request and obtain the documents. Under V.R.C.P. 45(a)(3), the
    party requesting the subpoena is responsible for serving the subpoena and, under V.R.C.P.
    45(b)(2), subpoenas issued by this Court must be served in Vermont. Both Vermont and
    Maryland, however, have adopted a version of the Uniform Interstate Depositions and
    Discovery Act, which allows a local court to reissue a subpoena if an out-of-state subpoena is
    filed with the local court clerk. See V.R.C.P. 45(f); 
    Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. §9-402
    . We
    GRANT Applicant’s request, but we strongly encourage Applicants to retain counsel to assist
    them in in serving the subpoena and procuring the requested documents from FEMA.
    _________________________________________                                September 18, 2012
    Thomas S. Durkin, Judge                                                Date
    =============================================================================
    Date copies sent: ____________                                     Clerk's Initials: _______
    Copies sent to:
    William and Rosemary Smith, Applicants/Appellants, pro se
    Thomas R. Paul, Attorney for Appellee Town of Concord
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 208-12-10 Vtec

Filed Date: 8/8/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/24/2018