Lawrence Site Plan Approval ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                                        State of Vermont
    Superior Court—Environmental Division
    =========================================================================
    ENTRY REGARDING MOTION
    =========================================================================
    In re Lawrence Site Plan Approval                   Docket No. 166-10-10 Vtec
    (Appeal from Town of Brattleboro Development Review Board decision)
    Title: Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 11)
    Filed: June 7, 2011
    Filed By: Appellee Stephen Lawrence
    Response in opposition filed on 6/21/11 by Appellant Susan Rockwell
    ___ Granted                          X Denied                         ___ Other
    By motion, Appellee Stephen Lawrence requests dismissal of Susan Rockwell’s
    appeal. In his motion Mr. Lawrence lists a number of reasons he believes dismissal is
    justified, reasons that chiefly speak to Ms. Rockwell’s behavior in this proceeding and the
    prejudices he has allegedly suffered due to Ms. Rockwell’s purported delays.
    We have considered the arguments that Mr. Lawrence puts forward and conclude
    that, even if we were to assume the accuracy of his allegations, we would not have before
    us a reason to dismiss Ms. Rockwell’s appeal. We remind the parties that dismissal is
    viewed as the “ultimate sanction” and should only be issued in extreme circumstances.
    See, e.g., State v. Howe Cleaners, Inc., 
    2010 Vt. 70
    , ¶ 18. Mr. Lawrence’s allegations do
    not establish that such extreme circumstances exist here. Consequently, we must DENY
    his motion to dismiss.
    We further note that all terms contained in the initial Scheduling Order (filed
    January 19, 2011) have now expired. It appears that the only remaining procedural step
    in this on-the-record appeal is for the parties to file their legal briefs, so that the Court
    may consider the merits of this appeal. We remind the parties that the Court is not
    allowed to consider new evidence or conduct a trial in this on-the-record appeal. See
    V.R.E.C.P. 5(h)(1). Rather, our task is to consider the record made before the DRB and
    determine whether the DRB’s factual findings are supported by “substantial evidence”
    present in the record. In re Stowe Highlands Resort PUD and PRD Application, 
    2009 VT 76
    , ¶ 7, 
    186 Vt. 568
     (citation omitted).
    So as to fulfill these procedural requirements, we hereby direct Appellant Rockwell
    to file her legal brief no later than Monday, August 29, 2011 and the Town of
    Brattleboro and Appellee Lawrence to file their respective legal briefs no later than
    Monday, September 19, 2011.
    _________________________________________                                 July 27, 2011_____
    Thomas S. Durkin, Judge                                                Date
    =============================================================================
    Date copies sent to: ____________                                           Clerk's Initials _______
    Copies sent to:
    Appellant Susan Rockwell, Esq., Pro Se
    Jodi P. French, Attorney for Interested Person Town of Brattleboro
    Appellee Stephen Lawrence, Pro Se
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 166-10-10 Vtec

Filed Date: 7/27/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/24/2018