Eagles Place LLC Construction ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                    STATE OF VERMONT
    SUPERIOR COURT                                                   ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION
    Vermont Unit                                                        Docket No. 55-4-14 Vtec
    Eagles Place, LLC Construction Application
    ENTRY REGARDING MOTION
    Title:         Motion to Clarify Scope of Trial (Motion 4)
    Filer:         Ronald Wanamaker
    Attorney:      Pro Se
    Filed Date:    December 19, 2014
    Response filed on 01/08/2015 by Attorney Mark G. Hall for Appellant Eagles Place, LLC
    Response filed on 01/09/2015 by Attorney Kimberlee J. Sturtevant for Interested Person City of
    Burlington
    Eagles Place, LLC (Applicant) applied for a permit from the City of Burlington
    Development Review Board (DRB) for redevelopment of the existing former Eagles Club
    building, located at 194 St. Paul Street, into a six-story apartment building, with ground-level
    commercial retail space. The DRB denied the application in a 31 page written decision issued
    on April 3, 2014. This decision contained a number of express positive findings, but ultimately
    denied the application based on a number of adverse findings. Applicant appealed that
    decision to this Court. Applicant has reached agreements resolving disputed issues with the
    City of Burlington and Allan S. Hunt and Frank Von Turkovich.
    A group of 12 interested persons (Intervenors) intervened in the matter and generally
    oppose the issuance of a permit to Applicant. That group, through their designated
    spokesperson Ronald Wannamaker, now moves to clarify the scope of trial and requests an
    order from the Court allowing them to raise any issues in defense of the DRB’s denial.
    Applicant and the City of Burlington (the City) both oppose this request arguing that the scope
    of appeal is limited to the Statement of Questions filed by the Applicant.
    This Court’s procedural rules dictate that in every appeal the appellant must file a
    Statement of Questions and that “[t]he appellant may not raise any question on the appeal not
    presented in the statement as filed, unless otherwise ordered by the court in a pretrial order
    . . . .” V.R.E.C.P. 5(f). Thus, “[a]s a general rule, ‘the Environmental Court is confined to the
    issues raised in the statement of questions filed pursuant to an original notice of appeal.” In re
    Jolley Assocs., 
    2006 VT 132
    , ¶ 9, 
    181 Vt. 190
     (quoting In re Garen, 
    174 Vt. 151
    , 156 (2002)).
    Where additional interested persons seek to participate in an appeal filed by another they may
    do so but the issues before the Court remain limited to the statement of questions. 
    Id.
     (noting
    that in Garen the Supreme Court concluded that “intervenors are permitted only to argue
    issues raised by a principal party”). “If a party wishes to determine the issues before the
    environmental court on appeal, the party must file a separate notice of appeal.” Garen, 174 Vt.
    at 156. The rules governing appeals to the Environmental Division do not provide for an
    intervening party to augment the issues on appeal. Id. at 155; Jolley Assocs., 
    2006 VT 132
    , ¶ 9.
    The only party to file a notice of appeal and a Statement of Questions was Applicant.
    The only issues before the Court, therefore, are those issues raised in that Statement of
    Questions. Intervenors’ request for an order stating that they may raise any possible defenses
    to the DRB’s decision, including those that are outside of Applicant’s Statement of Questions, is
    therefore DENIED. The matter before the Court is limited to the three questions raised in
    Applicant’s Statement of Questions, filed May 15, 2014.
    Electronically signed on January 12, 2015 at 04:00 PM pursuant to V.R.E.F. 7(d).
    _________________________________________
    Thomas G. Walsh, Judge
    Superior Court, Environmental Division
    Notifications:
    Mark G. Hall (ERN 2537), Attorney for Appellant Eagles Place, LLC
    Kimberlee J. Sturtevant (ERN 4778), Attorney for Interested Person City of Burlington
    Franklin L. Kochman (ERN 1682), Attorney for Interested Persons Allan S. Hunt and Frank Von
    Turkovich
    Interested Person Jacob H. Webster
    Interested Person Anne Geroski
    Interested Person Liisa Reimann Rivera
    Interested Person Thomas Simon
    Interested Person Margaret S. Mentes
    Interested Person Ronald Wanamaker
    Interested Person Norman Williams
    Interested Person Jerrold Manock
    Interested Person Marjorie Allard
    Interested Person John (Jack) Mentes
    Interested Person Dan Goltzman
    Interested Person Lucy Totten
    Interested Person Emily Lee
    rkane
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 55-4-14 Vtec

Filed Date: 1/12/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/24/2018