Appeal of Deptula ( 2000 )


Menu:
  •                                  STATE OF VERMONT
    ENVIRONMENTAL COURT
    }
    In re: Appeal of                   }
    Edward Deptula                    }      Docket No. 9-1-00 Vtec
    }
    }
    Decision and Order on Motion to Dismiss Town as Party
    Appellant Edward Deptula appealed from a decision of the Zoning Board of
    Adjustment (ZBA) of the Town of Montgomery granting a permit to Appellee-Applicant
    Joseph Nastasi to operate a machine shop. Appellant represents himself; Appellee-
    Applicant also represents himself; the Town of Montgomery is represented by Amanda
    S.E. Lafferty, Esq. Appellant has moved to dismiss the Town as a party.
    Appellant argues that the Town has no standing to participate as an interested party,
    because neither the town plan nor a town ordinance is "at issue" in this case, citing
    Sabourin v. Town of Essex, 
    146 Vt. 419
    , 420-21 (1985) and Rossetti v. Chittenden County
    Transportation Authority, 
    165 Vt. 61
    , 66 (1990). In those decisions, the Vermont Supreme
    Court ruled that a town may not bring an appeal challenging the wisdom of a zoning
    decision. However, a town may appeal (and may participate in an appeal brought by
    another) if there is a claim that the ZBA Aexceeded its authority or misconstrued a bylaw
    provision.@ Rossetti v. Chittenden County Transportation Authority, 
    165 Vt. 61
    , 66 (1990).
    The Court stated that A[w]ithout such a claim, we do not believe the bylaw was Aat issue@ as
    that term is used in 24 V.S.A. '4464(b)(2).@
    With such a claim, therefore, a bylaw is Aat issue@ to give the Town standing as an
    interested person. In the present case, Appellant claims that the ZBA misconstrued the
    bylaw=s provisions defining Ahome occupation@ and Alight industry,@ and requests damages
    and court costs. These claims give the Town standing to participate as a party in the
    appeal.
    Accordingly, based on the foregoing, Appellant=s Motion to Dismiss the Town as an
    Interested Party is DENIED. We will hold a conference BY TELEPHONE in this matter on
    1
    June 15, 2000 to discuss scheduling this appeal for a hearing.
    Done at Barre, Vermont, this 22nd day of May, 2000.
    _________________________________________________
    Merideth Wright
    Environmental Judge
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 9-1-00 Vtec

Filed Date: 5/22/2000

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/24/2018