Costco Act 250 Permit Amend JO (4-252) ( 2017 )

STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Docket No. 157-12-16 Vtec Costco Act 250 Permit Amend. Jurisdictional Opinion (#4-252) ENTRY REGARDING MOTION Act 250 Jurisdictional Opinion (157-12-16 Vtec) Title: Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Motion 5) Filer: Costco Wholesale Corp. Attorney: Mark G. Hall Filed Date: July 17, 2017 Response in Opposition filed on 08/21/2017 by Attorney Alexander J. LaRosa Appellant R.L. Vallee The motion is GRANTED. By its pending motion, Cross-Appellant Costco Wholesale Corp. (“Costco”) seeks summary judgment on the sole legal issue raised in Appellant R.L. Vallee’s (“Vallee”) Statement of Questions: whether Costco should be “required to obtain a formal amendment to its Act 250 Land Use Permit (#4C0288-19C) in order to modify the stormwater system previously approved by the District Commission.” Appellant R.L. Vallee’s Statement of Questions at 1, filed on December 30, 2016. Costco has proposed a revision to how treated stormwater is delivered from its final treatment in what is referred to as Wet Pond #1 to Sunnyside Brook. Those revised plans were the subject of a prior proceeding which has become final, due to the failure of any party, including Vallee, to appeal. Costco Stormwater Permit Amendment Appeal, No. 84-7-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Envtl. Div. Jul. 29, 2016)(Durkin, J.). The pending appeal was filed by Vallee from a jurisdictional opinion (#4-252) issued by the District 4 Environmental Commission Coordinator, who concluded that the revisions to Costco’s stormwater treatment system that were the subject of our Docket No. 84-7-15 Vtec also did not constitute a change under Act 250 Rule 34(A) that was material enough to require Costco to apply for and receive an amendment to its Act 250 Permit. On the same day that Vallee filed its motion for summary judgment, the Vermont Natural Resources Board (“NRB”) also filed a motion on June 14, 2017, seeking summary judgment in its favor and against Vallee on Vallee’s sole legal Question. By the Decision issued today, this Court Costco Act 250 Permit Amend. JO, No. 157-12-16 Vtec (EO on Costco Summ. Jud. Motion) (Dec. 8, 2017) p. 2 of 2. has granted the NRB’s summary judgment request, relying upon the prior decision in the Costco Stormwater Permit Amendment Appeal, the undisputed facts, and law that applies to when an amendment to a pre-existing Act 250 permit is required. We refer the reader to our Decision of today concerning the NRB’s summary judgment motion. For all the same reasons addressed in that Decision, we do hereby GRANT Costco’s summary judgment request. We conclude that the undisputed facts presented by the parties, when analyzed under the applicable law, require us to also render summary judgment for Cross- Appellant Costco in regard to the sole legal Question presented by Appellant Vallee. So Ordered. Electronically signed on December 08, 2017 at Newfane, Vermont, pursuant to V.R.E.F. 7(d). ________________________________ Thomas S. Durkin, Superior Judge Notifications: Jon T. Anderson (ERN 1856), Attorney for Appellant R.L. Vallee, Inc. Alexander J. LaRosa (ERN 5814), Co-counsel for Appellant R.L. Vallee, Inc. Gregory J. Boulbol (ERN 1712), Attorney for the Vermont Natural Resources Board Mark G. Hall (ERN 2537), Attorney for Cross Appellant Costco Wholesale Corp. vtadsbat