Granite City v. Perrotte ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT                                                           CIVIL DIVISION
    Washington Unit                                                                Case No. 23-CV-04485
    65 State Street
    Montpelier VT 05602
    802-828-2091
    www.vermontjudiciary.org
    Granite City Investors, LLC v. Ashley Perrotte et al
    ENTRY REGARDING MOTION
    Title:            Motion to Seal (Motion: 1)
    Filer:            Francine Belville
    Filed Date:       August 29, 2024
    Defendant Belville has filed a motion seeking to seal this action under V.R.P.A.C.R. 9.
    She asserts her belief that this eviction action might later be viewed and considered against her
    by potential future landlords. Plaintiff opposes the request.
    While the Court appreciates the potential concerns cited by Defendant, they do not
    warrant granting the extraordinary request. First, Vermont’s Courts and its cases are typically
    open and transparent to public view. That ensures public scrutiny and oversight over most
    judicial proceedings. Second, this case does not fall into the narrow category of cases that are
    statutorily exempt from public view, such as juvenile matters. Third, where circumstances
    warrant, individual documents are sometimes sealed in other types of cases. Defendant,
    however, seeks to seal this entire case.
    Finally, any request to seal faces a high bar. The Court must find that the request is
    supported by “good cause and exceptional circumstances.” Id. Those terms are further
    reinforced and defined by the strong constitutional right of access to court records set out in
    cases such as State v. Densmore, 
    160 Vt. 131
    , 133–35 (1993). See also Press-Enterprise Co. v.
    Super. Ct. of Cal., 
    478 U.S. 1
    , 13–14 (1986) (sealing must be “essential to preserve higher
    values and … narrowly tailored to serve that interest”).
    Defendant’s proffered fears of possible future uses of this proceeding fail to reach that
    high bar and, if accepted, would result in an order to seal in a great many eviction cases. The
    standards set out in Rule 9 do not support such a result.
    The motion is denied.
    Electronically signed on Monday, September 30, 2024, per V.R.E.F. 9(d).
    _______________________
    Timothy B. Tomasi
    Superior Court Judge
    Entry Regarding Motion                                                                  Page 1 of 1
    23-CV-04485 Granite City Investors, LLC v. Ashley Perrotte et al
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-cv-4485

Filed Date: 11/14/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/14/2024