Mansfield v. First National Bank , 6 Wash. 603 ( 1893 )


Menu:
  • The opinion of the court was delivered by

    Hoyt, J.

    The application for a writ of mandamus must be denied. The judgment which relator seeks to compel the lower court to enter is not authorized by the decision of this court. The opinion heretofore rendered (5 Wash. 665, 32 Pac. Bep. 789) clearly shows that this court recog*604nized the fact that it appeared from the record that the goods as to the custody of which the original controversy was commenced had been converted into money, and that the proceeds were in the hands of an officer of the court by consent of all the parties to the action. Such being the case, it must be held in all proceedings after such conversion that the money took the place of the goods, and that as it was in the hands of an officer of the court by consent it was as much at the risk of one party as of the other. And in all litigation thereafter the only question to be decided was as to which of the parties should receive said moneys from such officer, and that thereafter neither of them could be held responsible for the safe keeping thereof as against the other.

    It will thus be seen that the judgment which the petition and answer show that the court below was willing to enter was substantially the one directed by this court, with the exception that it does not appear that it proposed to enter a judgment in favor of the assignee as against the other parties to the action for costs. But from what was said upon the argument we are satisfied that a bare suggestion will induce the court below to so modify its judgment entry as to cover the question of costs. It is clear that since, if the goods had not been converted into money, the assignee would have been adjudged to be entitled to the possession thereof, and as an incident to such judgment would have recovered his costs against the adverse parties, he is entitled, in addition to having the proceeds of such goods turned over to him, to have judgment for his costs.

    Dunbar, O. J., and Scott and Anders, JJ., concur.

    Stiles, J., not sitting.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 540

Citation Numbers: 6 Wash. 603, 34 P. 143, 1893 Wash. LEXIS 345

Judges: Hoyt

Filed Date: 7/6/1893

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/16/2024