Personal Restraint Petition Of Jd Jones Barton ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                    FILED
    COURT OF APPEALS
    DIVISION Ti
    2015 HAY _ 5      AM 9: 28
    STATE OF WASHINGTON
    BY
    UTY
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
    DIVISION II
    In the Matter     of   the Personal Restraint Petition                             No. 46493 -4 -II
    of
    JD JONES BARTON,
    Petitioner.
    UNPUBLISHED OPINION
    WoxswICK, P. J. —             JD Jones Barton seeks relief from personal restraint imposed
    following his 2013 pleas of guilty to two counts of second degree assault and one count of first
    degree      unlawful possession of a       firearm.' He argues that ( 1) the jail' s certification of his jail time
    is inaccurate because it did not include the time between his arrest, April 21, 2008, and his
    arraignment,        June 24, 2008; (     2) the Department of Corrections ( DOC) has incorrectly calculated
    his      sentence   because it did not   give   him jail time   and good   time   credits   for that period; ( 3) the State
    1
    Barton originally       pleaded   guilty in 2008.        We remanded his judgment and sentence to the trial
    court      because its 180 -month         sentence      exceeded   the statutory       maximum      sentence.    He was
    resentenced in 2011 to a 156 -month sentence. We remanded that sentence to the trial court because
    his trial counsel misadvised him as to the sentencing consequences of his plea. He withdrew his
    2008 pleas of guilty but then pleaded guilty again in 2013 and again received a 156 -month
    sentence, to be followed by an 18 -month term of community custody. He later filed a motion to
    withdraw       his 2013      pleas   in the trial   court.    That court transferred his motion to this court for
    consideration as a personal restraint petition under               CrR 7. 8( c)( 2).
    No. 46493 -4 -II
    breached the      plea agreement       by not   correctly calculating his       sentence; (   4) the failure to credit that
    jail time and good time will cause him to serve more than the statutory maximum sentence for his
    crimes; (   5) he is entitled to restoration of earned early release credits that he lost while serving his
    2008 and 2011 judgments and sentences; and ( 6) the imposition of a term of community custody
    causes his sentence to exceed the statutory maximum sentence for his crimes.
    As to issues ( 1) through ( 4), Barton has not shown that he is entitled to jail time credits or
    good time credits against his 2013 judgment and sentence for the period from April 21, 2008 to
    June 24, 2008.          He served that period in jail as a sanction for violations of his conditions of
    community custody imposed following an earlier conviction. He received credit for that jail time
    and good time against that sanction. RCW 9. 94A.505( 6) provides that credits for presentence jail
    time can be made only against a judgment and sentence if the offender was in jail "solely in regard
    to the   offense   for   which   the   offender   is   being   sentenced."     Barton did not serve the April to June
    period   in jail solely for the        offenses   to    which   he   pleaded   guilty in 2013.      Therefore, he is not
    entitled to credits for that period against both his 2008 sanction and his 2013 judgment and
    sentence.    In   re   Pers. Restraint of Costello, 
    131 Wn. App. 828
    , 833, 
    129 P. 3d 827
     ( 2006). The jail
    did not err in its certification, DOC did not err in calculating his sentence, the State did not breach
    the plea agreement, and Barton will not be forced to serve more than the statutory maximum
    sentence for his crimes.
    As to issue ( 5),    Barton fails to show that he has any right to the restoration of previously
    lost   earned   early    release credits.    DOC has the authority to administer the earned early release
    credit system,         RCW 9. 94A.729( 1)(      a),    and requiring restoration of previously lost earned early
    release credit on account of a new              judgment       and sentence would      interfere    with   the   disciplinary
    No. 46493 -4 -II
    purpose of the earned early release credit system. In re Pers. Restraint of Williams, 
    121 Wn.2d 655
    , 661 -62, 
    853 P. 2d 444
     ( 1993).
    As to issue ( 6),   the State concedes that because the trial court imposed the statutory
    maximum sentence of 156 months of confinement ( 120 months for the crimes and 36 months for
    the   firearm   enhancements),   the trial court erred in also imposing a term of community custody
    because that term would cause Barton to serve more than the statutory maximum sentence. State
    v.   Boyd, 
    174 Wn.2d 470
    , 473, 
    275 P. 3d 321
     ( 2012). We accept the State' s concession.
    We grant Barton' s petition in part and remand his 2013 judgment and sentence to the trial
    court for correction by deletion of the term of community custody. In all other respects, we deny
    Barton' s petition and deny his request for monetary sanctions.
    A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the
    Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2. 06. 040,
    it is so ordered.
    We concur:
    MAXA, J.
    LLE, J.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 46493-4

Filed Date: 5/5/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/18/2021