State of Washington v. Ruvim Dezhnyuk ( 2016 )

FILED
JULY 28, 2016
In the Office of the Clerk of Court
WA State Court of Appeals, Division Ill
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION THREE
STATE OF WASHINGTON, )
) No. 33041-9-111
Respondent, )
)
V. )
)
RUVIM DEZHNYUK, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION
)
Appellant. )
SIDDOWAY, J. - Ruvim Dezhnyuk was convicted by a Kittitas County jury of
possession of a controlled substance: heroin. He contends the evidence is insufficient to
prove the identity of the narcotic because the drug was not actually presented at trial. We
conclude that circumstantial evidence here is more than sufficient to prove beyond a
reasonable doubt that he possessed heroin. Accordingly, we affirm his conviction.
FACTS
In September 2013, two Washington State Patrol troopers stopped a car on
Interstate 82 for speeding. Mr. Dezhnyuk was the driver, and the owner of the car-
Jessica Robinson-Willers-was in the passenger seat. One of the troopers smelled what
he thought was heroin when he contacted the car's occupants.
I
i
l
j
;
No. 33041-9-III
State v. Dezhnyuk
Ms. Robinson-Willers gave the troopers permission to search the car. They found
a digital scale with black, sticky residue hidden under the padding of a child's car seat in
the back seat, where the smell of heroin seemed to originate. The residue appeared to the
troopers to be heroin. The troopers also found the barrel of a pen and a clear plastic
baggie shoved down between Mr. Dezhnyuk's seat and the console. One of the troopers
later testified that the tube contained black residue and that such tubes were used to
inhale smoke from burning narcotics. The residue in the pen barrel field tested positive
for heroin; later, the Washington State Patrol Crime Lab verified the identity of the
substance. Although the pen barrel was not admitted into evidence, a drug chemist from
the crime lab testified that she did the drug test and concluded that the tube contained
heroin.
To convict Mr. Dezhnyuk of possessing heroin, the jury had to find beyond a
reasonable doubt from the evidence that on September 18, 2013, he possessed a
controlled substance (heroin) and that this act occurred in Washington. See Jury
Instruction 9, Clerk's Papers at 74; RCW 69.50.4013(1). The jury returned a verdict of
guilty.
ANALYSIS
Mr. Dezhnyuk contends the evidence does not support the drug identity element of
possessing heroin because neither the actual pen barrel containing the heroin residue nor
2
No. 33041-9-111
State v. Dezhnyuk
the residue itself was admitted at trial. He asserts that the failure to present this direct
evidence is the equivalent of having evidence suppressed by the court, requiring
dismissal. He fails to give credit to other direct and circumstantial evidence that supports
the elements of his offense.
Due process requires the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each element of
an offense. State v. Colquitt, 133 Wash. App. 789, 796, 137 P.3d 892 (2006). Evidence is
sufficient if, when viewed in the light most favorable to the State, it allows a rational trier
of fact to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. State v.
Thomas, 150 Wash. 2d 821, 874, 83 P.3d 970 (2004). A defendant who claims
insufficiency of the evidence necessarily admits the truth of the State's evidence and all
inferences that arise from that evidence. Id.
Here, the State presented evidence that established beyond a reasonable doubt the
identity of the residue in the pen barrel. The troopers testified that they had extensive
experience with heroin and recognized it on sight and by smell. Their field test of the
residue in the pen barrel was reinforced by the test of the material by the crime lab. And
the lab employee who conducted the chemical analysis testified as to her qualifications
and her conclusion that the residue was heroin. Finally, Ms. Robinson-Willers testified
that after officers initiated their traffic stop of her car, Mr. Dezhnyuk emptied out his
pockets, placed contents between the seats, reached back and placed a scale underneath
3
I
No. 33041-9-III
State v. Dezhnyuk
the child car seat cover, and handed her $800 in cash to hold for him. This evidence is
sufficient for a rational juror to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Dezhnyuk
possessed heroin.
Affirmed.
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW
2.06.040.
ff/dhtu~,'l}=
i
Siddoway,
WE CONCUR:
Fearing, C . J ~ ' Pennell, J.
4