State Of Washington v. Emilio Robert Hernandez ( 2013 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
No. 68764-6-1
Respondent,
DIVISION ONE
v.
EMILIO HERNANDEZ, UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Appellant. FILED: OCT 1 4 2013
Per Curiam. — Emilio Hernandez appeals the sentence imposed following his
convictions for first degree rape and first degree robbery. He contends the court erred in
instructing the jury that it had a "duty" to return a guilty verdict if it found the elements of
the crime were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. But the State correctly points out,
and Hernandez does not dispute, that Hernandez invited the error by using the same
language in his proposed instructions. Review is therefore precluded. City of Seattle v.
Patu, 147 Wash. 2d 717, 720-21, 58 P.3d 273 (2002). Hernandez has filed a pro se
statement of additional grounds but fails to adequately describe the nature and
occurrence of any alleged error as required by RAP 10.10(c). rv
Affirmed. Z_
For the court:
t*k j. to
& -£• yyv\«
J
V J~44e/