State Of Washington v. Brett White ( 2013 )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 69448-1-1
Respondent, o
DIVISION ONE S 3i
—I —'— 1
v. c m
rn o
BRETT DOMINIC WHITE, UNPUBLISHED OPINION £ 3^r
IP rr*'-
Appellant. FILED: December 30, 2013 "" •,1'-'
CO
CO
CO
Per Curiam. Brett White challenges his conviction of unlawful possession of a
firearm, assault in the fourth degree, and interference with domestic violence reporting
in King County No. 12-1-00658-6 KNT. His court-appointed attorney has filed a motion
to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument on review.
Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion to
withdraw must:
(1) be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might
arguably supportthe appeal. (2) A copy of counsel's brief should be
furnished the indigent and (3) time allowed him to raise any points that he
chooses; (4) the court-not counsel-then proceeds, after a full examination
of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.
Theobald. 78 Wash. 2d at 185 (quoting Anders. 386 U.S. at 744).
This procedure has been followed. White was informed of his right to file a
statement of additional grounds for review. White did not file a supplemental brief nor
statement of additional grounds for review.
The court specifically considered the following potential issues raised by counsel:
Did the information provide constitutionally sufficient notice of the charges?
No. 69448-1-1/2
Was the guilty plea involuntary?
Did the trial court err in imposing supervision by the Department of
Corrections as a condition of White's suspended sentence?
The issues raised by counsel are wholly frivolous. The motion to withdraw is
granted and the appeal is dismissed.
For the court:
V€