In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Guadalupe Martinez-Cervantes ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                                          FILED
    AUGUST 12, 2021
    In the Office of the Clerk of Court
    WA State Court of Appeals Division III
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
    DIVISION THREE
    In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of:     )         No. 38065-3-III
    )
    )
    GUADALUPE MARTINEZ-CERVANTES,                   )
    )         UNPUBLISHED OPINION
    Petitioner.                )
    )
    FEARING, J. — Guadalupe Martinez-Cervantes seeks relief from personal
    restraint imposed for his 2019 Franklin County convictions in two separate cases for
    felony violation of a no contact order, possessing a stolen motor vehicle, attempting to
    elude, and unlawful possession of a controlled substance. Martinez-Cervantes requests
    vacation of the count of unlawful possession of a controlled substance and resentencing
    on his remaining convictions, with recalculation of his offender score to exclude points
    derived from his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance. The State
    concedes the need for vacation of the single count and resentencing on the remaining
    counts. This court accepts the State’s concession.
    No. 38065-3-III
    PRP of Martinez-Cervantes
    In State v. Blake, 
    197 Wn.2d 170
    , 182-83, 186, 
    481 P.3d 521
     (2021), the Supreme
    Court held that Washington’s strict liability drug possession statute, former RCW
    69.50.4013(1), violated state and federal due process clauses and was therefore void. The
    Supreme Court did not specify whether its ruling applied to cases already final. But,
    established precedent counsels that Blake applies to such cases.
    In a personal restraint petition, this court cannot grant relief when the petition is
    filed more than one year after the judgment became final unless the sentence is invalid on
    its face, the trial court lacked competent jurisdiction, or the petition is based solely on one
    or more of the exceptions set forth in RCW 10.73.100(1)-(6). Guadalupe Martinez-
    Cervantes’ petition fits within the facial invalidity exception to RCW 10.73.090(1).
    For a claim to fit within the facial invalidity exception, the alleged error must be
    apparent on the face of the documents signed as a part of the sentence and any plea
    agreement. In re Personal Restraint of Stoudmire, 
    141 Wn.2d 342
    , 353, 
    5 P.3d 1240
    (2000). Because the former possession statute is void, because a defendant cannot be
    convicted based on a void statute, and because a void conviction cannot be included in a
    defendant’s offender score, this court need not look any further than the face of
    Guadalupe Martinez-Cervantes’ judgments and sentences to determine that his offender
    score is erroneous and that the current conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled
    substance is also void. State v. Carnahan, 
    130 Wn. App. 159
    , 164, 
    122 P.3d 187
     (2005);
    State v. Ammons, 
    105 Wn.2d 175
    , 187-88, 
    713 P.2d 719
    , 
    718 P.2d 796
     (1986).
    2
    No. 38065-3-III
    PRP of Martinez-Cervantes
    Accordingly, Martinez-Cervantes’ judgments and sentences are facially invalid and his
    petition is exempt from the time-bar. We may review the judgments and sentences on
    their merits. RCW 10.73.090(1).
    In the personal restraint context, this court will only grant relief for constitutional
    errors resulting in actual and substantial prejudice. In re Personal Restraint of Cook, 
    114 Wn.2d 802
    , 813, 
    792 P.2d 506
     (1990). Because a person cannot be punished for
    violating a void statute and because a sentence that is based upon an incorrect offender
    score is a fundamental defect that inherently results in a miscarriage of justice, Guadalupe
    Martinez-Cervantes also suffers actual and substantial prejudice. In re Personal
    Restraint of Goodwin, 
    146 Wn.2d 861
    , 868, 
    50 P.3d 618
     (2002). Therefore, this court
    grants Martinez-Cervantes’ petition for relief and remands the case to the trial court for
    resentencing in accordance with Blake. RAP 16.4(a).
    A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
    Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW
    2.06.040.
    _________________________________
    Fearing, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    _________________________________              ________________________________
    Pennell, C.J.                                  Lawrence-Berrey, J.
    3