- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 ZION T GRAE-EL, et al., CASE NO. C21-1678JLR 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 12 CITY OF SEATTLE, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On March 10, 2022, the court dismissed Plaintiff Caprice Strange’s claims against 16 Defendants Seattle Public Schools and Natalie Long (collectively, the “SPS Defendants”) 17 without prejudice and with leave to amend her complaint. (See 3/10/22 Order (Dkt. 18 # 62).) On May 22, 2022, Ms. Strange filed an amended complaint, which asserts claims 19 against the SPS Defendants. (See Am. Compl. (Dkt. # 77) at 5, 7, 36-37, 86, 94.) The 20 SPS Defendants have not answered the amended complaint. (See Dkt.) 21 The deadline for SPS Defendants to answer Ms. Strange’s amended complaint 22 passed more than six months ago. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(3) (requiring, in relevant 1 part, a response to an amended pleading within 14 days). Ms. Strange, however, has not 2 moved for entry of default against the SPS Defendants for failure to plead or otherwise 3 defend. (See Dkt.); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 55(a). 4 The court ORDERS Ms. Strange to SHOW CAUSE why her claims against the 5 SPS Defendants should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute no later than January 3, 6 2023. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Alternatively, Ms. Strange may, by January 3, 2023, file 7 a motion for entry of default against the SPS Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of 8 Civil Procedure 55(a) and Local Civil Rule 55(a). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a); Local Rules 9 W.D. Wash. LCR 55(a). The court warns Ms. Strange that failure to timely respond to 10 this order to show cause may result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. See 11 Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir. 2002) (discussing factors that the 12 court considers in determining whether to dismiss for failure to prosecute or comply with 13 a court order). The court reminds Ms. Strange to comply with the local rules when filing 14 her response to this order. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 55(a), 7(d)(3), 7(e). 15 Dated this 16th day of December, 2022. 16 A 17 18 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 19 20 21 22
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:21-cv-01678
Filed Date: 12/16/2022
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/4/2024