Nelson v. Dinca ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 RICHARD DEWAYNE NELSON, CASE NO. 3:21-cv-1457-RJB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATON AND 11 DENYING APPLICATION TO DINCA EMMANLELLE, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 12 Defendants. 13 14 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), 15 the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. Peterson, United States 16 Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 5), Plaintiff’s Objections (Dkt. 6), and the remaining record, finds that 17 the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 18 The Report and Recommendation recommends denying Plaintiff IFP status because he 19 declared that he has a current statement balance in his inmate account of $1780.62, which is 20 sufficient to pay the $402.00 filing fee required in a civil rights action. Plaintiff filed objections 21 to the Report and Recommendation, but the objections go to the merits of his claim; they do not 22 relate to his ability to pay the filing fee. See Dkt. 6. The Court agrees with the recommendation 23 to deny IFP status. 24 1 In addition to recommending denial of IFP status, the Report and Recommendation 2 advised Plaintiff that, should he elect to pay the filing fee, elements of his complaint are 3 presently defective – notably that he seeks to bring civil rights claims against his Prosecutor and 4 Judge but prosecutors and judges are absolutely immune from civil rights claims for acts done 5 within the scope of their official duties. Dkt. 5; citing Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 334–36 6 (1983); Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 431 (1976). In his objections, Plaintiff references 7 habeas corpus. Plaintiff should be advised of the warning in the Report and Recommendation 8 that he does not petition for habeas corpus relief in his complaint. 9 The hereby finds and ORDERS: 10 (1) The Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; 11 (2) Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 4) is denied; 12 (3) The Clerk shall file the complaint only upon receipt of the filing fee. If no filing fee 13 is paid within thirty days of the date of this Order, the Clerk is directed to close the 14 file; 15 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Honorable 16 Michelle L. Peterson. 17 The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and 18 to Plaintiff appearing pro se at said party’s last known address. 19 Dated this 21st day of December, 2021. 20 A 21 ROBERT J. BRYAN 22 United States District Judge 23 24