Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Brian Campbell Fischer ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                              
    2014 WI 107
    SUPREME COURT           OF   WISCONSIN
    CASE NO.:               2014AP517-D
    COMPLETE TITLE:         In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings
    Against
    Brian Campbell Fischer, Attorney at Law:
    Office of Lawyer Regulation,
    Complainant,
    v.
    Brian Campbell Fischer,
    Respondent.
    DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST FISCHER
    OPINION FILED:          August 20, 2014
    SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS:
    ORAL ARGUMENT:
    SOURCE OF APPEAL:
    COURT:
    COUNTY:
    JUDGE:
    JUSTICES:
    CONCURRED:
    DISSENTED:
    NOT PARTICIPATING:
    ATTORNEYS:
    
    2014 WI 107
                                                                     NOTICE
    This opinion is subject to further
    editing and modification.   The final
    version will appear in the bound
    volume of the official reports.
    No.    2014AP517-D
    STATE OF WISCONSIN                             :            IN SUPREME COURT
    In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings
    Against Brian Campbell Fischer, Attorney at
    Law:
    Office of Lawyer Regulation,                                          FILED
    Complainant,                                          AUG 20, 2014
    v.                                                            Diane M. Fremgen
    Clerk of Supreme Court
    Brian Campbell Fischer,
    Respondent.
    ATTORNEY      disciplinary      proceeding.         Attorney          publicly
    reprimanded.
    ¶1   PER CURIAM.       This is a reciprocal discipline matter.
    On March 7, 2014, the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) filed a
    complaint and motion pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.22
    requesting   that    this   court   publicly       reprimand      Attorney       Brian
    Campbell   Fischer    as    reciprocal   discipline         identical       to    that
    imposed by the Minnesota Supreme Court.
    No.       2014AP517-D
    ¶2    Attorney        Fischer   was       admitted    to     practice         law    in
    Wisconsin in 2002.            He is also admitted to practice law in
    Minnesota.
    ¶3    The OLR's complaint noted that on September 6, 2013,
    the   Minnesota      Supreme     Court          publicly    reprimanded            Attorney
    Fischer    for    misconduct     consisting        of    failing    to       supervise      a
    suspended attorney and assisting a suspended attorney in the
    unauthorized practice of law; failing to provide the Minnesota
    Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
    with timely notice of employment of a suspended attorney; using
    misleading       advertising    and     law      firm   signage     and       letterhead;
    neglecting and failing to communicate with two clients; failing
    to comply with a court order; failing to return client files;
    failing    to    expedite     litigation;        and    failing    to     cooperate        in
    disciplinary investigations.             The Minnesota Supreme Court found
    that Attorney Fischer violated Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4,
    1.15(c)(1) and (2), 1.16(d), 3.2, 3.4(c), 5.3(b) and (c)(1),
    5.5(a), 5.8(d), 7.1, 8.1(b), and 8.4(d), and Rule 25, Rules on
    Lawyers Professional Responsibility.
    ¶4    Attorney        Fischer   did        not    notify    the       OLR     of    the
    Minnesota reprimand within 20 days of its effective date.
    ¶5    On    April 10,     2014,    the      parties    filed      a     stipulation
    whereby Attorney Fischer agrees that the facts alleged in the
    OLR's complaint form a basis for the discipline requested by the
    OLR   director,       and     Attorney        Fischer      agrees       it     would       be
    appropriate for this court to impose a public reprimand.                                  The
    stipulation avers that Attorney Fischer fully understands the
    2
    No.   2014AP517-D
    misconduct    allegations,   fully       understands   the    ramifications
    should this court impose the stipulated level of discipline,
    fully understands his right to contest the matter, and fully
    understands his right to consult with counsel, and that his
    entry into the stipulation is made knowingly and voluntarily.
    ¶6   Under SCR 22.22(3), in reciprocal discipline matters,
    this court shall impose the identical discipline unless one of
    the enumerated exceptions is shown.           Attorney Fischer does not
    claim that any of those exceptions apply in this case.
    ¶7   IT IS ORDERED that Brian Campbell Fischer is publicly
    reprimanded   as   discipline   reciprocal     to   that   imposed   by   the
    Minnesota Supreme Court.
    3
    No.   2014AP517-D
    1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2014AP000517-D

Filed Date: 8/20/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014