Prentice v. Madden , 4 Chand. 170 ( 1851 )

Per Curiam.

The decree in this cause must be affirmed. The judgment against Madden was an individual judgment, and as such, bound only his individual property. It however held his interest in the trust property. But the bill does not charge Madden with any fraud in confessing judgment, but only a design to hinder and delay his creditors. The final averment of fraud is only a conclusion of law.