Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David G. Dudas , 2021 WI 5 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                                                               
    2021 WI 5
    SUPREME COURT           OF   WISCONSIN
    CASE NO.:              2014AP1651-D
    COMPLETE TITLE:        In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings
    Against David G. Dudas, Attorney at Law:
    Office of Lawyer Regulation,
    Complainant,
    v.
    David G. Dudas,
    Respondent.
    DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DUDAS
    OPINION FILED:         January 27, 2021
    SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS:
    ORAL ARGUMENT:
    SOURCE OF APPEAL:
    COURT:
    COUNTY:
    JUDGE:
    JUSTICES:
    Per Curiam.
    NOT PARTICIPATING:
    ATTORNEYS:
    
    2021 WI 5
    NOTICE
    This opinion is subject to further
    editing and modification.   The final
    version will appear in the bound
    volume of the official reports.
    No.    2014AP1651-D
    STATE OF WISCONSIN                                :            IN SUPREME COURT
    In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings
    Against David G. Dudas, Attorney at Law:
    Office of Lawyer Regulation,                                              FILED
    Complainant,                                             JAN 27, 2021
    v.                                                               Sheila T. Reiff
    Clerk of Supreme Court
    David G. Dudas,
    Respondent.
    ATTORNEY     disciplinary        proceeding.           Attorney's          license
    revoked.
    ¶1   PER CURIAM.         We review a stipulation filed pursuant
    to    Supreme   Court    Rule   (SCR)    22.12     by    the       Office    of    Lawyer
    Regulation      (OLR)    and    Attorney     David       G.     Dudas.            In   the
    stipulation, Attorney Dudas enters a no contest plea to the
    OLR's complaint and agrees that he committed the one count of
    professional      misconduct     alleged     in    the    complaint,         which     was
    committing criminal acts that reflect adversely on his honesty,
    trustworthiness,        or   fitness    as   a    lawyer      in    other     respects.
    Attorney Dudas agrees that revocation of his license to practice
    No.     2014AP1651-D
    law    in    Wisconsin          is    a   proper        level    of    discipline         for     this
    misconduct.
    ¶2      After reviewing the matter, we approve the stipulation
    and    revoke       Attorney         Dudas'     license         to    practice      law    in     this
    state.       We accede to the parties' request that the commencement
    date of the revocation be May 21, 2014, which was the date of
    the summary suspension of Attorney Dudas' law license.                                      Because
    this    matter       is    being       resolved         without       the    appointment        of    a
    referee, we impose no costs on Attorney Dudas.
    ¶3      Attorney           Dudas     was      admitted         to     practice       law      in
    Wisconsin in 1989.              He practiced in Stevens Point.
    ¶4      On August 16, 2013, Attorney Dudas was charged with 31
    criminal counts in Outagamie County Circuit Court.                                   On April 30,
    2014, following a trial, an Outagamie County jury found Attorney
    Dudas    guilty       of     30      criminal       counts,      including         felony    first-
    degree      sexual        assault,        felony        second-degree         reckless      injury,
    felony substantial battery, 14 counts of felony second-degree
    sexual       assault,           11     counts        of     felony          strangulation          and
    suffocation, one count of misdemeanor battery, and one count of
    misdemeanor intimidation of a victim.
    ¶5      Following the jury's verdict in the criminal case, the
    OLR moved pursuant to SCR 22.20 for a summary suspension of
    Attorney Dudas' Wisconsin law license.                               On May 21, 2014, this
    court       granted       the     motion      and       suspended      Attorney       Dudas'      law
    license until further order of the court.
    ¶6      On     July      16,       2014,     the     OLR       filed    a     disciplinary
    complaint alleging that Attorney Dudas' criminal acts reflected
    2
    No.     2014AP1651-D
    adversely    on   his     honesty,     trustworthiness,            or    fitness      as   a
    lawyer in other respects, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).1
    ¶7    Attorney Dudas pursued postconviction relief in the
    criminal case.         The parties filed a joint request for a stay of
    the   disciplinary       proceeding     and       the     continuance         of   Attorney
    Dudas' summary suspension pending postconviction and appellate
    proceedings in the criminal case.                     On January 12, 2015, this
    court granted the request, holding the disciplinary proceeding
    in abeyance and continuing the summary license suspension.
    ¶8    Attorney      Dudas      filed       an      appeal    of     his      criminal
    convictions in December 2016.                   The appeal was pending in the
    Wisconsin court system for years.                 During that time, the OLR and
    Attorney Dudas, through counsel, communicated about the status
    of the appeal and whether Attorney Dudas would file an SCR 22.19
    petition for consensual license revocation or stipulate to the
    revocation   of    his     license     as       sought    by     the    OLR.       The   OLR
    communicated      to     Attorney      Dudas       that     should       revocation        be
    imposed, it would request this court to order the revocation to
    commence    on    May    21,   2014,    the       date     the    underlying        related
    summary suspension had commenced.
    ¶9    The    court       of   appeals        affirmed        the        judgment     of
    conviction on February 18, 2020.                  On June 16, 2020, this court
    denied Attorney Dudas' petition for review.
    1SCR 20:8.4(b) provides:   "It is professional misconduct
    for a lawyer to commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on
    the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in
    other respects."
    3
    No.     2014AP1651-D
    ¶10     On July 14, 2020, this court ordered the parties to
    file a status report why the stay of the disciplinary proceeding
    should not be lifted.          The stay was lifted on October 21, 2020.
    The stipulation and no contest plea were filed on October 27,
    2020.     In the stipulation, Attorney Dudas acknowledges that to
    date the judgment of conviction remains unreversed following the
    completion of his direct appeal in state court.                        He acknowledges
    that under the present state of his case the OLR could establish
    his violation of SCR 20:8.4(b).
    ¶11     The stipulation states that Attorney Dudas answers the
    OLR's disciplinary complaint by entering a no contest plea, and
    he   agrees    that     this   court    may          use   the   allegations        of    the
    disciplinary       complaint    as     an    adequate          factual      basis    for    a
    determination      of   misconduct.             He    states     he   enters      into     the
    stipulation to resolve the pending proceeding and enters the no
    contest     plea   to    the   misconduct            allegation       for      purposes    of
    professional discipline only.               He states he reserves his right
    to pursue collateral challenges to his criminal convictions in
    state or federal courts.               The stipulation avers that neither
    Attorney Dudas nor the OLR intend that the stipulation will
    impact future litigation in Attorney Dudas' criminal matter.
    ¶12     The stipulation goes on to state that it does not
    result from plea-bargaining.                It notes that the OLR's position
    on sanction has remained constant throughout the proceeding.
    ¶13     Attorney Dudas represents and verifies that he fully
    understands the misconduct allegation; that he fully understands
    the ramifications should this court impose the stipulated level
    4
    No.     2014AP1651-D
    of discipline; that he fully understands his right to contest
    this matter; that he fully understands his right to consult with
    counsel and that he has had the benefit of advice of counsel
    throughout the proceeding; that his entry into the stipulation
    is made knowingly and voluntarily; and that his entry into the
    stipulation        represents          his     decision         not    to     contest           the
    allegations in the complaint or the level and type of discipline
    sought by the OLR's director.
    ¶14   Having        reviewed          the     stipulation        and        the        OLR's
    memorandum        in    support        of    the     stipulation,       we        approve      the
    stipulation and adopt the stipulated facts and legal conclusions
    of professional misconduct.                    Given the extreme seriousness of
    the    felony     criminal       convictions         that    underlie       the     misconduct
    allegation contained in the OLR's complaint, we agree that the
    revocation of Attorney Dudas' license to practice law in this
    state is an appropriate level of discipline.                             Consistent with
    this court's treatment of discipline imposed in proceedings that
    are filed following an SCR 22.20 summary suspension, we agree
    that   it    is    appropriate         to    set     the    commencement          date   of     the
    revocation        for    May     21,        2014,    the     effective       date        of    the
    underlying        SCR    22.20    summary       suspension.           See,    e.g.,       In     re
    Disciplinary       Proceedings          Against      Washington,       
    2007 WI 65
    ,    
    301 Wis. 2d 47
    ,        
    732 N.W.2d 24
    ;          In     re    Disciplinary           Proceedings
    Against Chvala, 
    2007 WI 47
    , 
    300 Wis. 2d 206
    , 
    730 N.W.2d 648
    .                                     In
    its memorandum in support of the stipulation, the OLR states the
    public   will      not    be     put    at    risk    by    a   retroactive         revocation
    commencement date since Attorney Dudas' Wisconsin law license
    5
    No.    2014AP1651-D
    will remain revoked unless and until he is able to prove his
    fitness to regain his license in a reinstatement proceeding.
    Since   this   matter   was   resolved   without   the   need     for   the
    appointment of a referee, no costs will be imposed.
    ¶15   IT IS ORDERED that the license of David G. Dudas to
    practice law in Wisconsin is revoked, retroactive to May 21,
    2014.
    ¶16   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent he has not
    already done so, David G. Dudas shall comply with the provisions
    of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to
    practice law in Wisconsin has been revoked.
    6
    No.   2014AP1651-D
    1
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2014AP001651-D

Citation Numbers: 2021 WI 5

Filed Date: 1/27/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/27/2021