Mackie v. Blankenship v. W. Va. Ofc. of Insurance Comm./Harden Trucking ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                              STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    FILED
    MACKIE V. BLANKENSHIP,                                                            March 3, 2017
    Claimant Below, Petitioner                                                    RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    OF WEST VIRGINIA
    vs.)   No. 16-0296 (BOR Appeal No. 2050813)
    (Claim No. 800098922)
    WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF
    INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
    Commissioner Below, Respondent
    and
    HARDEN TRUCKING COMPANY, INC.,
    Employer Below, Respondent
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Petitioner Mackie V. Blankenship, pro se, appeals the decision of the West Virginia
    Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. The West Virginia Office of the Insurance
    Commissioner, by Brandolyn Felton-Ernest, its attorney, filed a timely response.
    This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated March 8, 2016, in
    which the Board affirmed an August 28, 2015, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
    Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s January 6, 2015,
    decision denying Mr. Blankenship’s request to reopen his claim for further consideration of a
    permanent partial disability award as untimely filed. The Court has carefully reviewed the
    records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for
    consideration.
    This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
    arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
    by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
    presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
    reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.
    1
    On July 16, 1991, Mr. Blankenship completed a Report of Occupational Pneumoconiosis
    in which he alleged that he developed occupational pneumoconiosis as a result of exposure to
    occupational dust hazards. He indicated that his date of last exposure to the hazards of
    occupational pneumoconiosis was November 9, 1979. Subsequently, Mr. Blankenship was
    granted a 10% permanent partial disability award for occupational pneumoconiosis. On October
    16, 2001, he was granted an additional 5% permanent partial disability award for occupational
    pneumoconiosis by the Office of Judges pursuant to the Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board’s
    determination that Mr. Blankenship sustained a total of 15% whole person impairment as a result
    of occupational pneumoconiosis. On November 13, 2014, Mr. Blankenship filed a request to
    reopen his claim for further consideration of permanent partial disability benefits. In support of
    his request, Mr. Blankenship submitted a May 30, 2014, chest x-ray diagnostic report listing a
    diagnosis of pneumoconiosis, along with correspondence in which he alleges that his treating
    physician has informed him that his pulmonary function is decreasing.
    On January 6, 2015, the claims administrator denied Mr. Blankenship’s request to reopen
    his claim as untimely filed. In its Order affirming the claims administrator’s decision, the Office
    of Judges held that Mr. Blankenship’s request to reopen his claim is time-barred pursuant to
    West Virginia Code § 23-4-16(a)(2) (2005). The Board of Review affirmed the reasoning and
    conclusions of the Office of Judges in its decision dated March 8, 2016.
    West Virginia Code § 23-4-16(a)(2) provides that reopening requests arising from
    occupational pneumoconiosis claims in which an award of permanent disability was granted
    must be made within five years of the date of the most recent permanent partial disability award.
    The Office of Judges found that the date of Mr. Blankenship’s most recent permanent partial
    disability award for occupational pneumoconiosis was October 16, 2001. Therefore, pursuant to
    the provisions of West Virginia Code § 23-4-16(a)(2), any request to reopen the claim must have
    been filed within five years of the October 16, 2001, award. As was noted by the Office of
    Judges, Mr. Blankenship filed a request to reopen his claim more than thirteen years after the
    date of the most recent permanent partial disability award for occupational pneumoconiosis and,
    therefore, his request to reopen his claim is statutorily time-barred pursuant to the provisions of
    West Virginia Code § 23-4-16(a)(2).
    For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
    violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
    conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
    evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    2
    ISSUED: March 3, 2017
    CONCURRED IN BY:
    Chief Justice Allen H. Loughry II
    Justice Robin J. Davis
    Justice Margaret L. Workman
    Justice Menis E. Ketchum
    Justice Elizabeth D. Walker
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 16-0296

Filed Date: 3/3/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/3/2017