Glenn Tomblin v. Patriot Coal Co. ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    FILED
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               April 2, 2014
    RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    GLENN TOMBLIN,                                                                OF WEST VIRGINIA
    Claimant Below, Petitioner
    vs.)   No. 12-1100 (BOR Appeal No. 2046938)
    (Claim No. 2010126344)
    PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION,
    Employer Below, Respondent
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Petitioner Glen Tomblin, by Edwin H. Pancake, his attorney, appeals the decision of the
    West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Patriot Coal Corporation, by Henry C.
    Bowen, its attorney, filed a timely response.
    This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated August 28, 2012, in
    which the Board affirmed a February 10, 2012, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
    Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s August 3, 2011,
    decision denying Mr. Tomblin’s request to add sprain to the lumbar region, sciatica, and
    herniated disc as compensable components. The Court has carefully reviewed the records,
    written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for
    consideration.
    This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
    arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
    by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
    presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
    reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.
    Mr. Tomblin worked as a truck driver for Patriot Coal Corporation when he fell while
    getting off a bus on March 1, 2010. The claim was held compensable for right shoulder strain.
    Jack R. Steel, M.D., diagnosed Mr. Tomblin with sprain of lumbar region, sciatica, and herniated
    disc but did not state in his reports if these diagnoses should be added as compensable
    components or if they were related to the work injury. The claims administrator denied Mr.
    Tomblin’s request to add sprain to the lumbar region, sciatica, and herniated disc as compensable
    1
    components and concluded that there is no indication in the medical reports that Mr. Tomblin
    complained of pain to his lumbar spine in the first nine months post work injury.
    The Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s decision and held that the
    diagnoses of sprain to lumbar region, sciatica, and herniated disc are not compensable elements
    in this claim. On appeal, Mr. Tomblin disagrees and asserts that the Board of Review erred
    because the additional diagnoses have been verified by Dr. Steel as a result of the compensable
    injury. He further asserts that his prior back condition was made worse by this occupational
    injury that lead to the diagnoses of lumbar strain and herniated disc and that the herniated disc
    lead to sciatica. Patriot Coal Corporation maintains that Mr. Tomblin failed to submit any
    reliable medical evidence that his low back condition has any relation to his right shoulder injury
    of March 1, 2010.
    The Office of Judges concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support adding the
    diagnoses of sprain to the lumbar region, sciatica, and herniated disc as compensable
    components. The Office of Judges found that the report of injury completed by Mr. Tomblin
    included back pain as a symptom but the emergency room physician’s records stated that Mr.
    Tomblin denied back pain at that time. The emergency room physician did not order x-rays of
    the lumbar spine when he ordered x-rays of the shoulder. The Office of Judges found that Dr.
    Steel did note in his records that Mr. Tomblin complained of back pain radiating into his right
    leg but did not make a diagnosis of herniated disc until December 1, 2010. The Office of Judges
    determined that Mr. Tomblin’s back pain radiating into his right leg preexisted the injury
    because the complaints Mr. Tomblin made to Prasadarao B. Mukkamala, M.D., approximately
    three months prior to the subject injury were the same complaints that he made to Dr. Steel on
    April 14, 2010.
    In addition, the Office of Judges concluded that the denial of the lumbar sprain is
    supported by the fact that Mr. Tomblin was injured on March 1, 2010, and that the condition
    should have resolved by the time Dr. Steel started treating the condition in November of 2010
    because West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-3 (2006) does not allow the duration of care
    for lumbar sprain/strain to exceed eight weeks. The Office of Judges found that sciatica is merely
    a symptom rather than a diagnosis. It further found that a herniated disc is not supported by the
    record since the MRI of December 13, 2010, was not interpreted by the radiologist as showing a
    herniated disc. The Office of Judges determined that when the MRI dated December 13, 2010,
    was compared to the MRI of December 9, 2008, there appeared to be little change in Mr.
    Tomblin’s back condition and in fact the annular tear at L4-L5 was less conspicuous on the
    recent study than the previous one. The Office of Judges held that the diagnoses of sprain to
    lumbar region, sciatica, and herniated disc are not compensable diagnoses in this claim. The
    Board of Review reached the same reasoned conclusions in its decision of August 28, 2012. We
    agree with the reasoning and conclusions of the Board of Review.
    For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
    violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
    conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
    evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
    2
    Affirmed.
    ISSUED: April 2, 2014
    CONCURRED IN BY:
    Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
    Justice Brent D. Benjamin
    Justice Margaret L. Workman
    Justice Allen H. Loughry II
    DISSENTING:
    Justice Menis E. Ketchum
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-1100

Filed Date: 4/2/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014