Sarah E. Lobban v. Lobban Funeral Home ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    FILED
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               June 9, 2014
    RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    SARAH E. LOBBAN,                                                              OF WEST VIRGINIA
    Claimant Below, Petitioner
    vs.)   No. 13-0045 (BOR Appeal No. 2047452)
    (Claim No. 2009079857)
    LOBBAN FUNERAL HOME, INC.,
    Employer Below, Respondent
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Petitioner Sarah E. Lobban, by, Samuel F. Hanna, her attorney, appeals the decision of
    the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. Lobban Funeral Home, Inc., by
    Alyssa A. Sloan, its attorney, filed a timely response.
    This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated December 14, 2012, in
    which the Board affirmed a June 26, 2012, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
    Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s April 28, 2011,
    decision which granted Ms. Lobban a 13% permanent partial disability award. The Court has
    carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and
    the case is mature for consideration.
    This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
    arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
    by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
    presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
    reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.
    Ms. Lobban, a funeral director and embalmer, injured her lower back while moving a
    casket on December 26, 2008. Her claim was held compensable for displaced lumbar
    intervertebral disc and other specified sites of sprains/strains. The claims administrator granted
    Ms. Lobban a 13% permanent partial disability award on April 28, 2011. That decision was
    based upon an April 14, 2011, independent medical evaluation by Joseph Grady II, M.D. In the
    evaluation, Dr. Grady determined that Ms. Lobban had reached maximum medical improvement.
    Using the American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment,
    1
    (4th Edition, 1993), he assessed 17% lumbar spine impairment. When West Virginia Code of
    State Rules § 85-20-Table C (2006) was applied, he found that Ms. Lobban fit into Lumbar
    Category III which has a maximum impairment of 13%. He therefore found that her total whole
    person impairment was 13%. Ms. Lobban was also evaluated by Jeffrey Summers, D.C. In the
    October 31, 2011, independent medical evaluation, Dr. Summers found that Ms. Lobban had
    sustained 19% lumbar impairment using the American Medical Association’s Guides. Using
    West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-Table C, he determined that she fit into Lumbar
    Category II, which he stated indicates impairment between 10% and 13%. He accordingly
    adjusted his assessment to 13% whole person impairment.
    The Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s decision in its June 26, 2012,
    Order. The Office of Judges found that Dr. Grady’s independent medical evaluation was in
    accordance with both the American Medical Association’s Guides and West Virginia Code of
    State Rules § 85-20 (2006). The Board of Review adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of
    law of the Office of Judges and affirmed its Order in its December 14, 2012, decision. This Court
    agrees with the reasoning and conclusions of the Board of Review.
    For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
    violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
    conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
    evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    ISSUED: June 9, 2014
    CONCURRED IN BY:
    Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
    Justice Brent D. Benjamin
    Justice Margaret L. Workman
    Justice Menis E. Ketchum
    Justice Allen H. Loughry II
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-0045

Filed Date: 6/9/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014