Susan Stern v. W. Va. Office of Insurance Commissioner/W. Va. Dept. of Agriculture ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                              STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    FILED
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS                               June 27, 2014
    RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    SUSAN STERN,                                                                  OF WEST VIRGINIA
    Claimant Below, Petitioner
    vs.)   No. 13-0303	 (BOR Appeal No. 2047579)
    (Claim No. 2001052618)
    WEST VIRGINIA OFFICE OF
    INSURANCE COMMISSIONER
    Commissioner Below, Respondent
    and
    WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE,
    Employer Below, Respondent
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Petitioner Susan Stern, by M. Jane Glauser, her attorney, appeals the decision of the West
    Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review. The West Virginia Office of the Insurance
    Commissioner, by Gregory Evers, its attorney, filed a timely response.
    This appeal arises from the Board of Review’s Final Order dated February 25, 2013, in
    which the Board affirmed an August 1, 2012, Order of the Workers’ Compensation Office of
    Judges. In its Order, the Office of Judges affirmed the claims administrator’s December 28,
    2011, decision granting Ms. Stern a permanent total disability award with an onset date of
    February 11, 2011. The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and
    appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration.
    This Court has considered the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The facts and legal
    arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided
    by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record
    presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these
    reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.
    1
    Ms. Stern initially filed an application for permanent total disability benefits on June 19,
    2007. Ms. Stern’s June 19, 2007, application for permanent total disability benefits was rejected
    by the claims administrator on August 8, 2007, based on a finding that she had not met the
    statutory threshold necessary for further consideration of permanent total disability benefits
    contained in West Virginia Code § 23-4-6(n)(1) (2005). The Office of Judges affirmed the
    claims administrator’s decision rejecting Ms. Stern’s application for permanent total disability
    benefits on April 30, 2008. On December 1, 2008, the Board of Review affirmed the Office of
    Judges’ April 30, 2008, Order. This Court refused Ms. Stern’s petition appealing the Board of
    Review’s Order on December 7, 2009.
    On February 11, 2011, Ms. Stern filed a second application for permanent total disability
    benefits indicating that she has now met the necessary threshold for further consideration of a
    permanent total disability award and has lost sight in both eyes. Ms. Stern was granted a
    permanent total disability award on December 28, 2011, with a permanent total disability onset
    date of February 11, 2011, based on her February 11, 2011, application for permanent total
    disability benefits. The decision granting a permanent total disability award was presumably
    based on the presumption contained in West Virginia Code § 23-4-6(m) (2005), and the fact that
    Ms. Stern has now met the necessary threshold for further consideration of a permanent total
    disability award.
    In its Order affirming the claims administrator’s decision, the Office of Judges held that
    the claims administrator properly determined that the appropriate permanent total disability onset
    date in the instant claim is February 11, 2011, pursuant to West Virginia Code § 23-4-6(j)(5)
    (2005). Ms. Stern disputes this finding and asserts that she is entitled to an earlier onset date for
    permanent total disability benefits based on her initial application for permanent total disability
    benefits dated June 19, 2007.
    As noted by the Office of Judges, the language contained in West Virginia Code § 23-4­
    6(j)(5) is unambiguous and clearly states that the onset date for permanent total disability
    benefits shall be determined using the filing date of a properly completed application for
    permanent total disability benefits that “results in a finding of permanent total disability”. The
    Office of Judges found that it is undisputed that Ms. Stern filed the application on which her
    permanent total disability award was based on February 11, 2011. The Office of Judges then
    determined that pursuant to West Virginia Code § 23-4-6(j)(5), the earliest possible onset date
    for permanent total disability benefits is February 11, 2011, which is the filing date of the
    application resulting in a permanent total disability award. The Board of Review reached the
    same reasoned conclusions in its decision of February 25, 2013. We agree with the reasoning and
    conclusions of the Board of Review.
    For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
    violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
    conclusions of law, nor is it based upon a material misstatement or mischaracterization of the
    evidentiary record. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review is affirmed.
    2
    Affirmed.
    ISSUED: June 27, 2014
    CONCURRED IN BY:
    Chief Justice Robin J. Davis
    Justice Brent D. Benjamin
    Justice Margaret L. Workman
    Justice Menis E. Ketchum
    Justice Allen H. Loughry II
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-0303

Filed Date: 6/27/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014