Murray American Energy, Inc. v. Benjamin Parsons ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •                               STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    MURRAY AMERICAN ENERGY, INC.,                                                            FILED
    Employer Below, Petitioner                                                            January 20, 2021
    EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK
    vs.)   No. 19-1062 (BOR Appeal No. 2054299)                                       SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    OF WEST VIRGINIA
    (Claim No. 2018016156)
    BENJAMIN PARSONS,
    Claimant Below, Respondent
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Petitioner Murray American Energy, Inc., by Counsel Denise D. Pentino and Aimee M.
    Stern, appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board
    of Review”). Benjamin Parsons, by Counsel Robert L. Stultz, filed a timely response.
    The issues on appeal are temporary total disability benefits and medical benefits. The
    claims administrator closed the claim for temporary total disability benefits on July 2, 2018. In
    two separate Orders dated July 5, 2018, the claims administrator denied authorization for an
    evaluation by a neurologist and denied retroactive authorization for neuropsychological testing.
    The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges (“Office of Judges”) reversed the claims
    administrator’s decisions insofar as it denied an evaluation by a neurologist and affirmed the
    remainder of the claims administrator’s decisions in its May 24, 2019, Order. The Order was
    affirmed by the Board of Review on October 21, 2019.
    The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained
    in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration. The facts and legal arguments are adequately
    presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon
    consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no
    substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is
    appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    Mr. Parsons, a coal miner, was injured in the course of his employment on January 12,
    2018, when he was struck in the head by a falling rock. Treatment notes from Wheeling Hospital
    Emergency Department that day indicate Mr. Parsons was struck in the head by a rock in the coal
    mine. He reported pain in the top of his head and in his right shoulder. Mr. Parsons denied neck
    pain, numbness, and tingling. The Employees’ and Physician’s Report of Injury was completed on
    1
    January 12, 2018, and indicated Mr. Parsons injured his head, neck, and back when he was struck
    in the head by a rock. The physicians’ section was completed at Wheeling Hospital Emergency
    Department and listed the diagnoses as cervical strain and muscle spasms.
    Mr. Parsons sought treatment from Ross Tennant, FNP, on January 16, 2018, where he
    reported headaches and dizziness as well as muscles spasms in his neck. Mr. Tennant diagnosed
    closed head injury, post-concussion syndrome, and cervical strain. Mr. Parsons was unable to
    work. On January 23, 2018, Mr. Parsons reported significant symptom improvement. His cervical
    pain and dizziness had completely resolved. Mr. Parsons requested to be released to return to work.
    Mr. Tennant stated that Mr. Parsons could return to work on January 24, 2018. The claim was held
    compensable for neck strain and unspecified head/face injury on January 26, 2018. Mr. Parsons
    was granted temporary total disability benefits from January 13, 2018, through January 23, 2018.
    Mr. Parsons has a history of neck pain, back pain, and muscle spasms. On April 27, 2015,
    he was treated at Wheeling Hospital Physical Therapy for pain in the neck, right shoulder, left
    elbow, and right elbow. It was noted that there was no work-related injury involved. Mr. Parsons
    had previously been treated for the problems with corticosteroids. He was diagnosed with neck
    pain, left elbow pain, right elbow pain, and right shoulder pain.
    On May 18, 2016, Vic Wood, D.O., indicated Mr. Parsons was seen for medication refill
    for the chronic conditions of lower back and neck pain due to a motorcycle accident that occurred
    years prior. He was diagnosed with chronic lower back pain, neck pain, anxiety, depression, and
    muscle spasms. A brain CT scan was performed on August 6, 2016, for dizziness and weakness.
    The results were normal.
    Mr. Parsons was seen for the injury at issue on July 30, 2018, at Wheeling Hospital
    Emergency Room where he reported neck stiffness, dizziness, and headaches since his January 12,
    2018, injury. Mr. Parsons stated that the headaches may be the result of breathing coal dust at
    work. A brain CT scan showed left frontal sinusitis. A cervical CT scan showed a soft tissue injury.
    Mr. Parsons was diagnosed with sinusitis, otitis media, muscle pain, and muscle spasms.
    A February 1, 2018, treatment note by Mr. Tennant indicates Mr. Parsons reported muscle
    spasms in his neck and low back since returning to work on January 23, 2018. He stated that he
    was performing frequent shoveling. Mr. Tennant diagnosed closed head injury, post-concussive
    syndrome, cervical strain, and lumbar strain. Mr. Parsons’s was to resume physical therapy and
    could not return to work. Mr. Parsons returned on February 22, 2018, and reported that physical
    therapy resolved his lumbar pain. His cervical spine pain, however, had worsened. The diagnoses
    remained the same. Mr. Parsons was unable to return to work. A cervical MRI performed on
    February 27, 2018, was unremarkable.
    Alicia Puskar, PsyD, performed an evaluation on March 26, 2018, in which Mr. Parsons
    reported headache, dizziness, light sensitivity, memory difficulties, trouble concentrating, and
    irritability. Dr. Puskar opined that Mr. Parsons sustained a cerebral concussion on January 12,
    2018. She found that vestibular-ocular motor testing showed patterns of provoked dizziness. Dr.
    Puskar recommended vestibular therapy evaluation. Mr. Parsons was able to return to light-duty
    2
    work. On April 23, 2018, Mr. Parsons reported headaches, fatigue, dizziness, balance problems,
    light and noise sensitivity, trouble with concentration, memory issues, anxiety, and sleep issues.
    Mr. Parsons further reported that he could not return to work and that he was having problems
    with his union. Dr. Puskar stated that Mr. Parsons could return to above ground work only. She
    stated that rest would not help Mr. Parsons and that he needed to increase his activities.
    On May 16, 2018, Bill Hennessey, M.D., performed an independent medical evaluation in
    which he noted the compensable conditions as cervical sprain and head contusion. Dr. Hennessey
    noted that surveillance of Mr. Parsons taken in April of 2018 showed him raking, carrying a pipe,
    dumping dirt from a wheelbarrow, shoveling stone, carrying fishing poles, and digging a trench.
    On examination, Dr. Hennessey found full cervical range of motion with pain on the end range
    lateral rotation to his left side. Mr. Parsons had reached maximum medical improvement for the
    compensable conditions. Dr. Hennessey recommended no further treatment and found no residual
    permanent impairment.
    Cervical x-rays were performed on May 21, 2018, for cervical pain but showed no
    abnormal findings. In a May 25, 2018, treatment note, Mr. Tennant noted that Mr. Parsons was
    seen for posttraumatic concussion symptoms and neck pain. Mr. Parsons reported that his biggest
    problems were headaches and vision changes. Mr. Tennant diagnosed persistent complaints of
    headache and post-traumatic concussion symptoms and cervicalgia.
    In a June 6, 2018, treatment note, Ms. Puskar noted Mr. Parsons’s symptoms as headache;
    dizziness; nausea; fatigue; light and noise sensitivity; issues with balance, concentration, memory,
    attention, and cognition; anxiety; irritability; and depression. Neurocognitive testing showed
    worsening symptoms. Mr. Parsons’s was referred to neurology. Mr. Parsons’s was allowed to
    perform above ground work only.
    A June 27, 2018, treatment note by Victoria Kochick, PT, indicates Mr. Parsons’s
    movements were self-limiting on examination. On July 24, 2018, Mr. Parsons reported that he
    drove ten hours to the beach and back, swam, and did a flip into the water. It was noted that Mr.
    Parsons did not participate in home physical therapy and that he had not followed behavior
    regulation suggestions.
    The claims administrator closed the claim for temporary total disability benefits on July 2,
    2018. On July 5, 2018, in two separate decisions, the claims administrator denied authorization for
    an evaluation by a neurologist and denied retroactive authorization for neuropsychological testing.
    Mr. Parsons returned to Dr. Puskar on July 10, 2018, and admitted to not following
    recommendations to increase his activity. Dr. Puskar strongly advised him to return to his normal
    activities and supported any above ground work. On July 12, 2018, Mr. Parsons reported constant
    headaches, facial numbness, muscle spasms in his neck, blurred vision, fatigue, dizziness, and
    nausea to Mr. Tennant. The impression was closed head injury, post-concussive syndrome,
    cervical strain, and lumbar strain. On August 9, 2018, Mr. Parsons reported that trigger injections
    resolved his facial numbness. Mr. Tennant opined that Mr. Parsons could perform light-duty,
    above ground work only.
    3
    On September 12, 2018, Dr. Puskar opined that Mr. Parsons could return to full duty work
    on September 17, 2018. Mr. Parsons was seen on September 17, 2018, at Corporate Health. It was
    noted that Mr. Parsons had been released to return to full-duty work with no restrictions. Mr.
    Parsons reported that his symptoms had resolved and that he had been increasing his activities.
    Mr. Parsons testified in a March 5, 2019, deposition that he had been under the care of a
    concussion specialist, a neurologist, and a physical therapist for six months. Mr. Parsons stated
    that he returned to work on January 24, 2018, for four or five days, but his symptoms worsened.
    He stopped working on January 30, 2018, and did not return for eight or nine months. He has since
    been released to return to full duty work. Mr. Parsons testified that he still has migraines. He denied
    any preexisting issues. Mr. Parsons stated that his symptoms prevented him from returning to work
    on January 14, 2018. His symptoms continued after he stopped receiving temporary total disability
    benefits on May 23, 2018. His symptoms improved, and he was able to return to full duty work in
    September of 2018.
    The Office of Judges reversed the claims administrator insofar as it denied an evaluation
    by a neurologist and affirmed the remainder of the claims administrator’s decisions closing the
    claim for temporary total disability benefits and denying a neurological evaluation in its May 24,
    2019, Order. The Office of Judges found that temporary total disability benefits were suspended
    based on Dr. Hennessey’s May 16, 2018, independent medical evaluation in which he found that
    Mr. Parsons had reached maximum medical improvement. The Office of Judges found that on
    June 6, 2018, Dr. Puskar stated in a treatment note that Mr. Parsons could return to above ground
    work. She further opined on July 10, 2018, that Mr. Parsons needed consistent, demanding work.
    She released Mr. Parsons to return to full-duty work on September 12, 2018. The Office of Judges
    found Dr. Hennessey’s finding that Mr. Parsons had reached maximum medical improvement for
    the compensable conditions to be persuasive and further determined that Mr. Parsons’s return to
    work was supported by his treating physician, Dr. Puskar.
    Regarding the requested medical treatment, the Office of Judges found that the claims
    administrator denied an evaluation with a neurologist because Dr. Hennessey opined that Mr.
    Parsons required no further treatment and that he was not receiving treatment at that time. The
    Office of Judges found, however, that the opinion of Dr. Puskar was more persuasive. Dr. Puskar
    is a psychologist, and neuropsychological testing showed worsening of Mr. Parsons’s symptoms
    and declined neurocognitive scores. Dr. Puskar opined that Mr. Parsons may be suffering from
    post-traumatic migraines and recommended referral to neurology for assessment. Mr. Parsons
    underwent such testing on July 10, 2018, and it showed continuing issues related to depression and
    post-traumatic migraines. The Office of Judges determined that though Dr. Hennessey found Mr.
    Parsons to be at maximum medical improvement, Dr. Puskar found that he required an evaluation
    by a neurologist. It therefore reversed the claims administrator’s denial of an evaluation of a
    neurologist and authorized the treatment.
    Lastly, the Office of Judges found that the request for neuropsychological testing was
    properly denied. It found that the claims administrator denied the request by statute. Pursuant to
    West Virginia Code of State Rules § 85-20-9.10, psychiatric treatment beyond an initial
    consultation requires prior review and authorization. Neuropsychological testing, as requested by
    4
    Mr. Parsons, therefore requires preauthorization, which was not obtained. The Board of Review
    adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Office of Judges and affirmed its Order
    on October 21, 2019.
    After review, we agree with the reasoning and conclusions of the Office of Judges as
    affirmed by the Board of Review. The claim was properly closed for temporary total disability
    benefits because Mr. Parsons was released to return to work. He was also found to be at maximum
    medical improvement. Authorization of a referral to a neurologist was properly authorized as it
    was found to be medically related and reasonable required treatment for the compensable injury.
    Lastly, retroactive authorization of neuropsychological testing was properly denied by statute.
    For the foregoing reasons, we find that the decision of the Board of Review is not in clear
    violation of any constitutional or statutory provision, nor is it clearly the result of erroneous
    conclusions of law, nor is it so clearly wrong based upon the evidentiary record that even when all
    inferences are resolved in favor of the Board of Review’s findings, reasoning and conclusions,
    there is insufficient support to sustain the decision. Therefore, the decision of the Board of Review
    is affirmed.
    Affirmed.
    ISSUED: January 20, 2021
    CONCURRED IN BY:
    Chief Justice Evan H. Jenkins
    Justice Elizabeth D. Walker
    Justice Tim Armstead
    Justice John A. Hutchison
    Justice William R. Wooton
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1062

Filed Date: 1/20/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/20/2021