West Virginia Division of Highways v. Larry D. Scott ( 2024 )

FILED
August 1, 2024
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA
West Virginia Division of Highways,
Employer Below, Petitioner
v.) No. 23-258 (JCN: 2019015684)
(ICA No. 22-ICA-135)
Larry D. Scott,
Claimant Below, Respondent
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Petitioner West Virginia Division of Highways appeals the March 6, 2023, memorandum
decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia (“ICA”). See W. Va. Div. of
Highways v. Scott, No. 22-ICA-135, 2023 WL 2365786 (W. Va. Ct. App. Mar. 6, 2023)
(memorandum decision). Respondent Larry D. Scott filed a timely response.1 The issue on appeal
is whether the ICA erred in affirming the August 29, 2022, decision of the Worker’s Compensation
Office of Judges2, which reversed the claim administrator’s order denying Mr. Scott’s claim of
compensability for the occupational disease of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. The Office
of Judges found that Mr. Scott sustained an occupational disease pursuant to the provisions of
West Virginia Code § 23-4-1(f).3
The petitioner asserts that the underlying decision of the ICA is in violation of statutory
provisions regarding the compensability of occupational diseases and is clearly wrong in view of
the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence of the whole record, because the evidence fails to
establish that Mr. Scott’s disease was causally connected to his employment. Mr. Scott argues that
1
The petitioner is represented by counsel James W. Heslep, and the respondent is
represented by counsel James R. Fox.
2
The ICA, not the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, reviewed the Office of
Judges’ decision in this case because the Office of Judges’ order was entered during the transfer
to the reconstituted Board of Review. See W. Va. Code § 23-5-8a(a) (transferring powers and
duties of Office of Judges to Board of Review).
3
Although the respondent passed away on August 12, 2019, this Court has previously
recognized that if a claimant in a workers’ compensation case dies during the pendency of the
claims process, the claim shall proceed as if death had not occurred. See Martin v. Workers’ Comp.
Div., 210 W. Va. 270, 557 S.E.2d 324 (2001).
1
the compelling evidence clearly proves the direct causal connection between Mr. Scott’s prolonged
exposure to radiation from using a nuclear gauge and his development of a deadly form of cancer
at the exact spot of the prolonged penetration of radiation.
This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while factual findings are accorded deference
unless those findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, No. 23-43,
2024 WL 1715166 (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find
no reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).
Affirmed.
ISSUED: August 1, 2024
CONCURRED IN BY:
Chief Justice Tim Armstead
Justice Elizabeth D. Walker
Justice John A. Hutchison
Justice William R. Wooton
Justice C. Haley Bunn
2