Dallas Hankins v. Sprouting Farms Corp. ( 2024 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                FILED
    August 1, 2024
    C. CASEY FORBES, CLERK
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    OF WEST VIRGINIA
    STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA
    SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
    Dallas Hankins,
    Claimant Below, Petitioner
    v.)    No. 22-919 (JCN: 2021013918)
    (ICA No. 22-ICA-12)
    Sprouting Farms Corp.,
    Employer Below, Respondent
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    Petitioner Dallas Hankins appeals the November 15, 2022, memorandum decision of the
    Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia (“ICA”). See Hankins v. Sprouting Farms Corp.,
    No. 22-ICA-12, 
    2022 WL 17168088
     (W. Va. Ct. App. Nov. 15, 2022) (memorandum decision).
    Respondent Sprouting Farms Corp. filed a timely response.1 The issue on appeal is whether the
    ICA erred in affirming the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Office of
    Judges,2 which affirmed three orders of the claim administrator, entered on September 1, 2021,
    and October 6, 2021, suspending temporary total disability benefits, denying authorization for
    lumbar epidural steroid injections, and denying the addition of lumbar radiculopathy as a
    compensable condition in the claim.
    The claimant asserts that the ICA erred in affirming the Office of Judges’ decision. The
    employer maintains that the claimant points to no erroneous procedure, no arbitrary or capricious
    conclusions, and no abuse of discretion or jurisdictional error by the tribunals below.
    This Court reviews questions of law de novo, while we accord deference to factual findings
    unless the findings are clearly wrong. Syl. Pt. 3, Duff v. Kanawha Cnty. Comm’n, No. 23-43, 
    2024 WL 1715166
     (W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024). Upon consideration of the record and briefs, we find no
    reversible error and therefore summarily affirm. See W. Va. R. App. P. 21(c).
    Affirmed.
    1
    The petitioner is represented by counsel Reginald D. Henry and Lori J. Withrow, and the
    respondent is represented by counsel Jeffrey Brannon.
    2
    The ICA, not the Workers’ Compensation Board of Review, reviewed the Office of
    Judges’ decision in this case because the Office of Judges’ order was entered during the transfer
    to the reconstituted Board of Review. See 
    W. Va. Code § 23-5
    -8a(a) (transferring powers and
    duties of Office of Judges to Board of Review).
    1
    ISSUED: August 1, 2024
    CONCURRED IN BY:
    Chief Justice Tim Armstead
    Justice Elizabeth D. Walker
    Justice John A. Hutchison
    Justice William R. Wooton
    Justice C. Haley Bunn
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-919

Filed Date: 8/1/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/1/2024