All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court, N.D. West Virginia |
2019-05 |
- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG JAMES B. SWEERIS Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:19-CV-46 (GROH) CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES, LLC and DOES 1 TO 50, Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (AR&R@) of United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble. Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rules, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Trumble for submission of a proposed R&R. Magistrate Judge Trumble issued his R&R [ECF No. 8] on April 11, 2019. Therein, Magistrate Judge Trumble recommends that this Court dismiss the Plaintiff’s complaint [ECF No. 1] without prejudice and deny as moot his application to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), this Court must conduct a de novo review of the magistrate judge=s findings where objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge to which no objection is made. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and of a plaintiff’s right to appeal this Court’s Order. 28.U.S.C..' 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Objections to Magistrate Judge Trumble’s R&R were due within fourteen plus three days of service. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The pro se Plaintiff accepted service on April 17, 2019. ECF No. 9. To date, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, this Court will review the R&R for clear error. Upon careful review of the R&R, it is the opinion of this Court that Magistrate Judge Trumble’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] should be, and is hereby, ORDERED ADOPTED for the reasons more fully stated therein. The Court hereby ORDERS that the Plaintiffs complaint [ECF No. 1] be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed /n Forma Pauperis [ECF No. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to strike this case from the active docket and transmit a copy of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff by certified mail, return receipt requested. ooo DATED: May 9, 2019 Loa ZARA. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Info
Docket Number: 3:19-cv-00046
Filed Date: 5/9/2019
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/4/2024