United States v. Castro

U NITED S TATES A IR F ORCE
C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
________________________
No. ACM S32650
________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Larry D. CASTRO
Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant
________________________
Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 31 August 2021
________________________
Military Judge: Rebecca E. Schmidt.
Sentence: Sentence adjudged on 14 February 2020 by SpCM convened at
Travis Air Force Base, California. Sentence entered by military judge
on 9 March 2020: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 80 days, and
reduction to E-1.
For Appellant: Major Alexander A. Navarro, USAF; Major Christopher
C. Newton, USAF.
For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew J. Neil, USAF.
Before POSCH, RICHARDSON, and CADOTTE, Appellate Military
Judges.
________________________
This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as
precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.
________________________
PER CURIAM:
The findings and sentence entered are correct in law and fact, and no error
materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a)
and 66(d), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(d) (Man-
ual for Courts-Martial, United States (2019 ed.)).
United States v. Castro, No. ACM S32650
Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED. *
FOR THE COURT
CAROL K. JOYCE
Clerk of the Court
* The Statement of Trial Results failed to include the command that convened the
court-martial as required by R.C.M. 1101(a)(3). Appellant has not claimed prejudice
and we find none. See United States v. Moody-Neukom, No. ACM S32594, 2019 CCA
LEXIS 521, at *2–3 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 16 Dec. 2019) (unpub. op.) (per curiam).
2